Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Forked Thread: Action economy with companions/summons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mengu" data-source="post: 4674417" data-attributes="member: 65726"><p>Forked from: <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showpost.php?postid=4674312" target="_blank">Summoning and the Hypothetical Battle Reality </a></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I feel this is kind of a valid point. I was imagining ranger companions would work a little differently. For instance I though they might have an at-will power that let both the ranger and the companion attack. Maybe something that lets the companion attack, do damage equal to <strong>, and the ranger attacks, doing [W]. This would be closer to twin strike in chances to hit at least once and apply quarry damage.</strong></p><p> <strong></strong></p><p><strong>However I think the role of the class should play into what a companion or summoned creature does. So while this would make a good mechanic for a Ranger, from a controller I expect something a little different. For the Druid, I think the instinctive action mechanic is a good one. It can essentially give the summoner the equivalent of two standard actions, if he can use his powers tactically. For instance if the druid summons a Fierce Boar, he should be working in tandem with the boar, pushing or sliding targets away from the boar before the end of his turn, so the boar is free to charge something. Unlike a ranger, the druid has the tools to arrange the battle field to assist his allies (including the summoned creature), so why not make the druid use those tools?</strong></p><p> <strong></strong></p><p><strong>I think economy of actions can be a bit more flexible, especially with daily powers, as long as the effects don't supercede the capabilities of what other classes of the same role can do with similar powers.</strong></p><p> <strong></strong></p><p><strong>For instance, a Wizard's summons may have something a little different than the druid. Instead of instinctive action, they might have Auras, where they make an attack against any creature that begins its turn in the aura, essentially replacing the automatic damage from flaming sphere, for maybe slightly more damage at the cost of an attack roll.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mengu, post: 4674417, member: 65726"] Forked from: [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showpost.php?postid=4674312"]Summoning and the Hypothetical Battle Reality [/URL] I feel this is kind of a valid point. I was imagining ranger companions would work a little differently. For instance I though they might have an at-will power that let both the ranger and the companion attack. Maybe something that lets the companion attack, do damage equal to [B], and the ranger attacks, doing [W]. This would be closer to twin strike in chances to hit at least once and apply quarry damage. However I think the role of the class should play into what a companion or summoned creature does. So while this would make a good mechanic for a Ranger, from a controller I expect something a little different. For the Druid, I think the instinctive action mechanic is a good one. It can essentially give the summoner the equivalent of two standard actions, if he can use his powers tactically. For instance if the druid summons a Fierce Boar, he should be working in tandem with the boar, pushing or sliding targets away from the boar before the end of his turn, so the boar is free to charge something. Unlike a ranger, the druid has the tools to arrange the battle field to assist his allies (including the summoned creature), so why not make the druid use those tools? I think economy of actions can be a bit more flexible, especially with daily powers, as long as the effects don't supercede the capabilities of what other classes of the same role can do with similar powers. For instance, a Wizard's summons may have something a little different than the druid. Instead of instinctive action, they might have Auras, where they make an attack against any creature that begins its turn in the aura, essentially replacing the automatic damage from flaming sphere, for maybe slightly more damage at the cost of an attack roll.[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Forked Thread: Action economy with companions/summons
Top