Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jubelo" data-source="post: 4492802" data-attributes="member: 50">Sorry it's taken so long for me to get back to you, Hodag.The preliminary Monstrous Compendium looks good. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I have no experience with FilePro (and don't have it in any case) so I'd be of no use there.If we decide on using a mostly 2nd edition layout, that's fine too. I like the 4e stat block because it's more compact and we could fit several versions of the same monster on one page.  I do agree that the general 4e look isn't as good looking as it could be though.I hope that my comments didn't come across as snarky at all; I often write when I'm tired and suspect I'm not as clear as I could be.JonP.S.  Been working on a mid paragon solo fire mage to be the leader of the Rekindled Brotherhood. I should have him up in a day or so on the monster thread.</blockquote>