Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Forked Thread: Core Prestige Classes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 4437000" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>I think that by advancing the mystic powers of 2 classes, they give the PC too much.</p><p></p><p>Sure, there is a little bit of a penalty imposed by the double class prerequisites, but once you get past that hurdle, you're getting nearly everything 2 classes have to offer...at least, the meat of them.</p><p></p><p>So I prefer spellcasting hybrids like the Geomancer, in which you must choose which spellcasting class gets advanced, or those in which the PrCl has its own unique spell list.</p><p></p><p>They're rare, I know, and they got rarer with each expansion. Most of the spellcasting PrCls with dual class prereqs follow the theurge model.</p><p></p><p>By that, I know I'm the minority opinion on this.</p><p></p><p>But just to clear things up, know that I don't <em>BAN</em> those PrCls, or penalize people for choosing them. My dislike remains, but that is one area in which I don't impose my opinion on my campaign design.</p><p></p><p>Heck, I even have one (and <em>only</em> one) PC who uses the Mystic Theurge class- a Drow Rgr/MU/Druid converted from 1Ed to 3Ed as a Druid/SpecWiz Transmuter/MT. (It was the only way to carryover the spellcasting potential of the original into the updated 20 year old campaign.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, I see VoP as one (badly worded) way of playing an ascetic, but its not the<em> only</em> way.</p><p></p><p>I have personally played an ascetic Paladin who did just fine. VoP was not specifically disallowed, but BoED was not on the allowed sources list- it was just Core + Completes (no Psionics).</p><p></p><p>Without all the VoP bonuses, she eschewed all armor except some leather armor, used IUC, a quarterstaff and sling as her weapons (eventually, both armor and staff became enchanted). In fact, by her culture, she was forbidden from using better equipment because she was from the Laborer's Caste. Wearing better armor or carrying a "real" weapon would have been grounds for execution.</p><p></p><p>Still, she contributed to the advancement of party goals just fine.</p><p></p><p>Could she be played like a normal Pally? Of course not- she was not a front-line fighter. But she was fun and interesting to play...and definitely viable without VoP.</p><p></p><p>As for VoP itself, I don't see it as a "hybrid" of anything. Its an attempt to model in a single feat the status of someone as a "saint." (Yes, I know there is a Saint PrCl, but as a warrior-esque class it's rather atypical of the people who actually get awarded that status IRL- few of them are actually warriors.)</p><p></p><p>It probably would have been better as a PrCl itself, but that's not what they did.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 4437000, member: 19675"] I think that by advancing the mystic powers of 2 classes, they give the PC too much. Sure, there is a little bit of a penalty imposed by the double class prerequisites, but once you get past that hurdle, you're getting nearly everything 2 classes have to offer...at least, the meat of them. So I prefer spellcasting hybrids like the Geomancer, in which you must choose which spellcasting class gets advanced, or those in which the PrCl has its own unique spell list. They're rare, I know, and they got rarer with each expansion. Most of the spellcasting PrCls with dual class prereqs follow the theurge model. By that, I know I'm the minority opinion on this. But just to clear things up, know that I don't [I]BAN[/I] those PrCls, or penalize people for choosing them. My dislike remains, but that is one area in which I don't impose my opinion on my campaign design. Heck, I even have one (and [I]only[/I] one) PC who uses the Mystic Theurge class- a Drow Rgr/MU/Druid converted from 1Ed to 3Ed as a Druid/SpecWiz Transmuter/MT. (It was the only way to carryover the spellcasting potential of the original into the updated 20 year old campaign.) Again, I see VoP as one (badly worded) way of playing an ascetic, but its not the[I] only[/I] way. I have personally played an ascetic Paladin who did just fine. VoP was not specifically disallowed, but BoED was not on the allowed sources list- it was just Core + Completes (no Psionics). Without all the VoP bonuses, she eschewed all armor except some leather armor, used IUC, a quarterstaff and sling as her weapons (eventually, both armor and staff became enchanted). In fact, by her culture, she was forbidden from using better equipment because she was from the Laborer's Caste. Wearing better armor or carrying a "real" weapon would have been grounds for execution. Still, she contributed to the advancement of party goals just fine. Could she be played like a normal Pally? Of course not- she was not a front-line fighter. But she was fun and interesting to play...and definitely viable without VoP. As for VoP itself, I don't see it as a "hybrid" of anything. Its an attempt to model in a single feat the status of someone as a "saint." (Yes, I know there is a Saint PrCl, but as a warrior-esque class it's rather atypical of the people who actually get awarded that status IRL- few of them are actually warriors.) It probably would have been better as a PrCl itself, but that's not what they did. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Forked Thread: Core Prestige Classes
Top