Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked Thread: Dealing with sociopathic PCs (Was: Stop being so paranoid)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 4495124" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Well, I think you start out with a slightly flawed premise - that there's a way the PCs are "supposed" to deal with NPCs, and the world around them. The implication is that they are doing it wrong, and your intended way was right. </p><p></p><p>I saw no mention of a prior agreement with the players on the game themes. Regardless of what the rulebooks might say - if you had not all explicitly agreed beforehand that they were supposed to be heroes, then they are under no obligation to play such, and doing what you prescribe here is being a bit of a jerk.</p><p></p><p>I'm guessing that's not what you meant, though. So, I will assume that the missing part here is that you specifically billed the game as heroic adventure, and that they are violating the genre they originally agreed to.</p><p></p><p>At which point, I have to rather strongly disagree with you - "slowly screw with the players to teach them a lesson" is not a good plan. When there's a problem, <em>talk to the players</em>. </p><p></p><p>If and only if they continue to claim they know they are supposed to be heroes, but have the characters continue to behaving in unheroic fashion, is there any teaching to be done.</p><p></p><p>Then, I still have to disagree with you. Behavior is altered by rewarding desired behavior, and providing disincentive to undesired behavior. If they know they're supposed to be heroes, but aren't playing that way, making them the powerful villains of the piece is not a disincentive. </p><p></p><p>Honestly, if they jerk me around like that and lie to me about their intentions, I'm apt to just pack up my books and go home. I don't have time for players who lie to me, and having the game fold up is a disincentive.</p><p></p><p>If I were feeling a bit more poetic, I'd use somethign similar to your method, but without any of the implied glory of doom, and being the big villain of the piece. If the players continue to violate the genre they agree to, they lose.</p><p></p><p>That means they don't get the power and glory and fun. That means the Good Guys are on their tails, and the BBEG that I originally intended for the campaign wins. They end up dead, or poor, powerless, and friendless in a world that's been handed to someone else. </p><p></p><p>Then, I explain to them that if they want to play villains, or just kill things and take their stuff, I'm open to that kind of gaming - but not if they lie to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 4495124, member: 177"] Well, I think you start out with a slightly flawed premise - that there's a way the PCs are "supposed" to deal with NPCs, and the world around them. The implication is that they are doing it wrong, and your intended way was right. I saw no mention of a prior agreement with the players on the game themes. Regardless of what the rulebooks might say - if you had not all explicitly agreed beforehand that they were supposed to be heroes, then they are under no obligation to play such, and doing what you prescribe here is being a bit of a jerk. I'm guessing that's not what you meant, though. So, I will assume that the missing part here is that you specifically billed the game as heroic adventure, and that they are violating the genre they originally agreed to. At which point, I have to rather strongly disagree with you - "slowly screw with the players to teach them a lesson" is not a good plan. When there's a problem, [i]talk to the players[/i]. If and only if they continue to claim they know they are supposed to be heroes, but have the characters continue to behaving in unheroic fashion, is there any teaching to be done. Then, I still have to disagree with you. Behavior is altered by rewarding desired behavior, and providing disincentive to undesired behavior. If they know they're supposed to be heroes, but aren't playing that way, making them the powerful villains of the piece is not a disincentive. Honestly, if they jerk me around like that and lie to me about their intentions, I'm apt to just pack up my books and go home. I don't have time for players who lie to me, and having the game fold up is a disincentive. If I were feeling a bit more poetic, I'd use somethign similar to your method, but without any of the implied glory of doom, and being the big villain of the piece. If the players continue to violate the genre they agree to, they lose. That means they don't get the power and glory and fun. That means the Good Guys are on their tails, and the BBEG that I originally intended for the campaign wins. They end up dead, or poor, powerless, and friendless in a world that's been handed to someone else. Then, I explain to them that if they want to play villains, or just kill things and take their stuff, I'm open to that kind of gaming - but not if they lie to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked Thread: Dealing with sociopathic PCs (Was: Stop being so paranoid)
Top