Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Razuur" data-source="post: 4528709" data-attributes="member: 1997">Mallus, I am not going to even go there.&nbsp; The entire thing is subjective and it is quite obvious from your posts on multiple threads how you stand.I wrote the post with honesty from my perspective and I believe that much of that my post and my list is subjective.We simply disagree.&nbsp; And apparently never will.&nbsp; That is okay.&nbsp; I even wished people (and you are in that group) who like 4e good luck and wished them happy gaming.&nbsp; I am not lashing out, being a 4e hater.&nbsp; The question was whether we thought 4e went to far or not far enough.&nbsp; I feel that it went to far for the reasons above.It is *VERY* obvious that your and my play styles are *VERY* different and that we have *VERY* different opinions on what we find as a stong system.And that is just fine.&nbsp; We can both be right because it is subjective.I bid you good day.Razuur</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Razuur, post: 4528709, member: 1997"] Mallus, I am not going to even go there. The entire thing is subjective and it is quite obvious from your posts on multiple threads how you stand. I wrote the post with honesty from my perspective and I believe that much of that my post and my list is subjective. We simply disagree. And apparently never will. That is okay. I even wished people (and you are in that group) who like 4e good luck and wished them happy gaming. I am not lashing out, being a 4e hater. The question was whether we thought 4e went to far or not far enough. I feel that it went to far for the reasons above. It is *VERY* obvious that your and my play styles are *VERY* different and that we have *VERY* different opinions on what we find as a stong system. And that is just fine. We can both be right because it is subjective. I bid you good day. Razuur [/QUOTE]

Verification