Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 4530190" data-attributes="member: 48965">I just wantede to comment on this statement, as I've seen it trotted out a few times as far as when discussing editions of D&amp;D.&nbsp; What does what &quot;any edition of D&amp;D&quot; have to do with whether something should be in 4e or not?&nbsp; If this was a valid argument...well then THAC0 should still be in the game as before 3e...any edition of D&amp;D hadn't done this before.&nbsp;&nbsp; I'm not trying to single you out Mallus, but I really feel like this is a pretty flimsy defense for certain things, especially when they are either examples of things other games have been doing for years...or things that should have logically flowed from the evolution (instead of rebuilding) that many thought 4e would be to 3e (especially since SW Saga ed. was touted as a &quot;preview&quot;...<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm&nbsp; &nbsp; :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" />...which it, IMO, really wasn't).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 4530190, member: 48965"] I just wantede to comment on this statement, as I've seen it trotted out a few times as far as when discussing editions of D&D. What does what "[I]any[/I] edition of D&D" have to do with whether something should be in 4e or not? If this was a valid argument...well then THAC0 should still be in the game as before 3e...[I]any[/I] edition of D&D hadn't done this before. I'm not trying to single you out Mallus, but I really feel like this is a pretty flimsy defense for certain things, especially when they are either examples of things other games have been doing for years...or things that should have logically flowed from the evolution (instead of rebuilding) that many thought 4e would be to 3e (especially since SW Saga ed. was touted as a "preview"...:erm:...which it, IMO, really wasn't). [/QUOTE]

Verification