Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Forked Thread: Fix Stat Polarity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nymrohd" data-source="post: 4697488" data-attributes="member: 59126"><p>Forked from: <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showpost.php?postid=4692380" target="_blank"> http://www.enworld.org/forum/4e-fan-creations-house-rules/251472-fix-stat-polarity.html</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So I think I came with some interesting and relatively simple house rule in replacing ability attacks with a level based attack. Let's first see the numbers:[FONT=&quot]</p><p>[/FONT][ATTACH]39365[/ATTACH]</p><p>The premise is a starting score of 18, no ED ability increase to the attack stat, weapon expertise at level 4 (a new feat in PHB2 that gives you +1 to hit with one weapon group or implement increasing to +2 at 15, +3 at 25) and a weapon that is level +2 always available. You could possibly be worse by -1 to attack by starting with a 16 or +2 by starting with a 20 and taking Demigod or a similar ED but this loss can be handled. What we do see is a less than linear progression, with a base of 5 that increases by 27 points over 3 tiers.</p><p>My proposed house rule is this:</p><p>All characters have a Base Attack Bonus equal to their level -1 per tier. You start at +0 and increase by one at each level other than 11 and 21 (thus weakening slightly the two most powerful levels in 4E). Magic weapons and implements no longer provide an enhancement bonus to attack rolls (and still provide such a bonus to damage rolls). We increase weapon proficiency bonus for all weapons by +5, and give a +5 bonus to all implement attacks. Any attack powers that have neither a weapon or implement keyword and currently function with the +2/+4/+6 bonus scheme, loose that bonus.</p><p></p><p>The Weapon expertise feat from PHB 2 remains in the game as a Paragon tier feat that grants +1 to attack rolls, +2 at level 21 with the same wording it currently has (thus people who optimised for attack can still gain the full bonus). Intelligent Blademaster and Melee Training from PHB2 are no longer needed.</p><p></p><p>What this changes:</p><p>Your attack bonus now scales linearly across levels</p><p>Your attack bonus is decoupled from an ability. While you still use it for damage and feats, and possibly defenses, you no longer are compelled by the game math to increase that score at every level, and do your best to start with as high a score as possible. This could lead to characters with more rounded scores.</p><p>You no longer have to weight the +1 to hit from a +4 magic weapon compared to a +3 magic weapon with an awesome ability. Actually, simple magic weapons and implements should well be removed from the game.</p><p></p><p>Reservations:</p><p>It might be that this change depowers your primary score far too much. While for some concepts I consider this welcome (for instance, the warlock) other classes may well favor a different score heavily against their former primary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nymrohd, post: 4697488, member: 59126"] Forked from: [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showpost.php?postid=4692380"] http://www.enworld.org/forum/4e-fan-creations-house-rules/251472-fix-stat-polarity.html[/URL] So I think I came with some interesting and relatively simple house rule in replacing ability attacks with a level based attack. Let's first see the numbers:[FONT="] [/FONT][ATTACH]39365._xfImport[/ATTACH] The premise is a starting score of 18, no ED ability increase to the attack stat, weapon expertise at level 4 (a new feat in PHB2 that gives you +1 to hit with one weapon group or implement increasing to +2 at 15, +3 at 25) and a weapon that is level +2 always available. You could possibly be worse by -1 to attack by starting with a 16 or +2 by starting with a 20 and taking Demigod or a similar ED but this loss can be handled. What we do see is a less than linear progression, with a base of 5 that increases by 27 points over 3 tiers. My proposed house rule is this: All characters have a Base Attack Bonus equal to their level -1 per tier. You start at +0 and increase by one at each level other than 11 and 21 (thus weakening slightly the two most powerful levels in 4E). Magic weapons and implements no longer provide an enhancement bonus to attack rolls (and still provide such a bonus to damage rolls). We increase weapon proficiency bonus for all weapons by +5, and give a +5 bonus to all implement attacks. Any attack powers that have neither a weapon or implement keyword and currently function with the +2/+4/+6 bonus scheme, loose that bonus. The Weapon expertise feat from PHB 2 remains in the game as a Paragon tier feat that grants +1 to attack rolls, +2 at level 21 with the same wording it currently has (thus people who optimised for attack can still gain the full bonus). Intelligent Blademaster and Melee Training from PHB2 are no longer needed. What this changes: Your attack bonus now scales linearly across levels Your attack bonus is decoupled from an ability. While you still use it for damage and feats, and possibly defenses, you no longer are compelled by the game math to increase that score at every level, and do your best to start with as high a score as possible. This could lead to characters with more rounded scores. You no longer have to weight the +1 to hit from a +4 magic weapon compared to a +3 magic weapon with an awesome ability. Actually, simple magic weapons and implements should well be removed from the game. Reservations: It might be that this change depowers your primary score far too much. While for some concepts I consider this welcome (for instance, the warlock) other classes may well favor a different score heavily against their former primary. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Forked Thread: Fix Stat Polarity
Top