Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LostSoul" data-source="post: 4640465" data-attributes="member: 386">Yeah, I agree.  Once the ability to safely have an Extended Rest was taken away from the players in my game, their choices became a lot tougher.  A lot more interesting, too.  I think it would have been better if they had left those kind of choices in the game (medium-term strategic ones, I guess you could call it).Instead the focus is very strongly on the encounter.I agree.  In 4E, the game revolves around tactical decisions made round-by-round.  Once you get that extended rest, you're good to go.  It seems rare by design to "threaten" the availability of extended rests.  So like you say, you're pretty bad-ass all the time.Which is, to me, pretty simulationist!  I would have liked the game to support more gamist long- and medium-term strategic choices.</blockquote>