Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="catsclaw227" data-source="post: 4641070" data-attributes="member: 14197">OK, so correct me if I am wrong, but I have never stated that I can't fathom other's thoughts about this.  In fact, on many occasions on this boartd,  I have stated clearly that I know others have different opinions about this and that I accept that their interpretations are different than mine and agree that because of this 4e might not be the game for them. Where have I said or even implied that I can't fathom nother opinions about this?And I wouldn't say that it isn't a priority, to mesh mechanics and narrative, but instead, we have been able to mesh it in a way that works for us (and apparently others have as well, so I am not alone here.)Dude, I am not dredging up another argument about abstraction.  If you read the quoted part, I was simply putting my position about HP abstraction in words.  I was trying to provide context for my opinion.  Why are you bent on denouncing my opinions? I wasn't stating that it was the only way, it's just how I see it.Did I say that it wasn't more abstract?  No.   I said that it didn't feel any more wonky for my group.  The diference in abstraction doesn't make a difference for us.</blockquote>