Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked Thread: How would you have done 4e's Powers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="howandwhy99" data-source="post: 4542431" data-attributes="member: 3192"><p>I would have any starting level PC powers and higher level PC-created powers be first Player-defined when it comes to the fictional game world, but GM-defined when it comes to the rule system. Players would never be told the rules except via description in the same way they would never be told about an adventure module's contents except by descriptive summary. However, the Players will learn of the effects of the rules through playing in the game world. Because of this they may figure out some of the metagame system on their own, but the whole is still unknown to them (all of this is exploring the fictional world anyways as the two are the same in terms of operation). </p><p></p><p>That is not to say a power may not have a numerical definition like a weapon has a numerically defined damage range (i.e. 1-6), but the player does not fully know what the weapon is capable of until used, often repeatedly and in different circumstances. For instance, a mundane, corroded, copper sword may do nothing more than 1d4 damage, but the player would not learn even this small amount of information until using it (telling the player the damage to roll after the swing).</p><p></p><p>NPC & Game World-defined powers are totally GM-defined with Player recommendations being about on par with Player recommendations to any other Player. These powers are far more extensive then Player-defined powers. They cover the full range of how the world operates. For example: the life sucked out by a lich, the will one loses when taken over by a vampire, the weight of a stone, or the list of a boat when sailed under different wind speeds. </p><p></p><p>GMs also need to adapt Player-defined descriptions into his or her own Game World descriptions to account for why things work the way they do. As the Player learns the true extent of each of his' or hers' powers, those powers increase in utility/true power in relation to everything else in the world. The GM then re-evaluates his or her own hidden "power level" judgments for PC-powers in the system. It doesn't matter what the power is. This is the same for a magic spell as it is for a wooden stake. I'm defining Player powers here as "anything in the game world the PC can use to their advantage" whether it be object or action. For example, the wooden stake may originally be used only to pitch a tent, but then increases in power as players learn to use it for climbing, staking doors, and even killing vampires. As it's newly understood utility is learned by non-PCs in the world, its' value is rebalanced in gp cost (gold pieces being both an in-game and out-of-game measure of power). IMO, starting level gp costs are more about the desired starting difficulty for PCs/Players vs. the current measure of utility known to more or fewer NPCs, so they don't get adjusted.</p><p></p><p>Also, it's best to keep starting number of powers for PCs small so the total number doesn't overwhelm the DM (or the Players if they are young). This keeps the work load to a desirable level, though continuous as long as the game is played. Also, as the true importance/utility of powers increases by learning more of what they actually are through play, it's best to start with only a handful to allow for fresh game play with new powers throughout the game. This does not necessarily mean complexity increases as old powers are already fairly understood. They are not lost, so a PC's total options increase. But they are rarely being explored too. </p><p></p><p>IMO, one aspect of good game design is not just how many powers it offers, but how well it aids a DM with rules to simulate Player-defined powers without supplanting real choice from that player. Personally, infinite mathematical systems are more favorable to finite systems. </p><p></p><p>Plus, no matter how many powers or abilities Players begin with it's best to call the starting level "Level 1" and begin all new PCs/Players there. If you don't start all new PCs at starting level, you disenfranchise Players of their achievement of reaching higher level - as truth just about any computer RPG recognizes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="howandwhy99, post: 4542431, member: 3192"] I would have any starting level PC powers and higher level PC-created powers be first Player-defined when it comes to the fictional game world, but GM-defined when it comes to the rule system. Players would never be told the rules except via description in the same way they would never be told about an adventure module's contents except by descriptive summary. However, the Players will learn of the effects of the rules through playing in the game world. Because of this they may figure out some of the metagame system on their own, but the whole is still unknown to them (all of this is exploring the fictional world anyways as the two are the same in terms of operation). That is not to say a power may not have a numerical definition like a weapon has a numerically defined damage range (i.e. 1-6), but the player does not fully know what the weapon is capable of until used, often repeatedly and in different circumstances. For instance, a mundane, corroded, copper sword may do nothing more than 1d4 damage, but the player would not learn even this small amount of information until using it (telling the player the damage to roll after the swing). NPC & Game World-defined powers are totally GM-defined with Player recommendations being about on par with Player recommendations to any other Player. These powers are far more extensive then Player-defined powers. They cover the full range of how the world operates. For example: the life sucked out by a lich, the will one loses when taken over by a vampire, the weight of a stone, or the list of a boat when sailed under different wind speeds. GMs also need to adapt Player-defined descriptions into his or her own Game World descriptions to account for why things work the way they do. As the Player learns the true extent of each of his' or hers' powers, those powers increase in utility/true power in relation to everything else in the world. The GM then re-evaluates his or her own hidden "power level" judgments for PC-powers in the system. It doesn't matter what the power is. This is the same for a magic spell as it is for a wooden stake. I'm defining Player powers here as "anything in the game world the PC can use to their advantage" whether it be object or action. For example, the wooden stake may originally be used only to pitch a tent, but then increases in power as players learn to use it for climbing, staking doors, and even killing vampires. As it's newly understood utility is learned by non-PCs in the world, its' value is rebalanced in gp cost (gold pieces being both an in-game and out-of-game measure of power). IMO, starting level gp costs are more about the desired starting difficulty for PCs/Players vs. the current measure of utility known to more or fewer NPCs, so they don't get adjusted. Also, it's best to keep starting number of powers for PCs small so the total number doesn't overwhelm the DM (or the Players if they are young). This keeps the work load to a desirable level, though continuous as long as the game is played. Also, as the true importance/utility of powers increases by learning more of what they actually are through play, it's best to start with only a handful to allow for fresh game play with new powers throughout the game. This does not necessarily mean complexity increases as old powers are already fairly understood. They are not lost, so a PC's total options increase. But they are rarely being explored too. IMO, one aspect of good game design is not just how many powers it offers, but how well it aids a DM with rules to simulate Player-defined powers without supplanting real choice from that player. Personally, infinite mathematical systems are more favorable to finite systems. Plus, no matter how many powers or abilities Players begin with it's best to call the starting level "Level 1" and begin all new PCs/Players there. If you don't start all new PCs at starting level, you disenfranchise Players of their achievement of reaching higher level - as truth just about any computer RPG recognizes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked Thread: How would you have done 4e's Powers?
Top