Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Forked Thread: Length of movies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Man in the Funny Hat" data-source="post: 4462822" data-attributes="member: 32740"><p>What makes ANY movie good to watch regardless of length. Start with good writing. Add good acting and direction, some competent editing and a few other secret ingredients and now I'll stop this metaphor before it gets out of control.</p><p> </p><p>The thing about wanting to keep running times low isn't trivial. I first learned about the notion in reading about Star Wars back when I was a hopeless Star Wars geek. I had read that one of the reasons that George Lucas has trimmed about 10 minutes or so of scenes aside from pacing was to keep the running time under 2 hours so that theaters wouldn't have to sacrifice one showing every night and thus make it more attractive for them. Now, nobody could have predicted it would just DESTROY box-office records the way it did making the issue of its running time rather moot but when your thinking in terms of profitability its something you need to consider.</p><p> </p><p>You don't generally expect a movie to be packing them in with everyone scrambling to get in or waiting in lines. In that case you want the casual moviegoer who walks up to the box office or checks listings to see what's playing to be able to choose YOUR movie. If there's another showing of your film starting soon then they don't have to choose something else. If your film runs 3 hours and there's only three shows a night and the second one is already underway that casual moviegoer isn't going to wait the 3 hours - they'll pick someone elses movie to see.</p><p> </p><p>I guess I'm just saying that IF a movie is going to draw the crowds its length isn't much of an issue. If you can't expect it to be super-popular then from a purely business standpoint shorter is better.</p><p> </p><p>But then again, if a movie is crap and isn't going to draw anyone at all then the running time is once again irrelevant. Having 4 people in 4 shows a night over the weekend instead of 4 people in 3 shows a night adds up to no profits for anyone anyway.</p><p> </p><p>One last factor to consider is what KIND of movie it is. If it's action/adventure kind of stuff you can expect to see more of the movies default demographic in general - young males. If it's an artsy period costume drama then you are already setting your profits lower because the general demographics of moviegoers indicates you'll see fewer people than a shoot-em-up. And then once again the running time becomes signficant to getting people in to see YOUR movie instead of something else that is more likely to have another showing starting soon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Man in the Funny Hat, post: 4462822, member: 32740"] What makes ANY movie good to watch regardless of length. Start with good writing. Add good acting and direction, some competent editing and a few other secret ingredients and now I'll stop this metaphor before it gets out of control. The thing about wanting to keep running times low isn't trivial. I first learned about the notion in reading about Star Wars back when I was a hopeless Star Wars geek. I had read that one of the reasons that George Lucas has trimmed about 10 minutes or so of scenes aside from pacing was to keep the running time under 2 hours so that theaters wouldn't have to sacrifice one showing every night and thus make it more attractive for them. Now, nobody could have predicted it would just DESTROY box-office records the way it did making the issue of its running time rather moot but when your thinking in terms of profitability its something you need to consider. You don't generally expect a movie to be packing them in with everyone scrambling to get in or waiting in lines. In that case you want the casual moviegoer who walks up to the box office or checks listings to see what's playing to be able to choose YOUR movie. If there's another showing of your film starting soon then they don't have to choose something else. If your film runs 3 hours and there's only three shows a night and the second one is already underway that casual moviegoer isn't going to wait the 3 hours - they'll pick someone elses movie to see. I guess I'm just saying that IF a movie is going to draw the crowds its length isn't much of an issue. If you can't expect it to be super-popular then from a purely business standpoint shorter is better. But then again, if a movie is crap and isn't going to draw anyone at all then the running time is once again irrelevant. Having 4 people in 4 shows a night over the weekend instead of 4 people in 3 shows a night adds up to no profits for anyone anyway. One last factor to consider is what KIND of movie it is. If it's action/adventure kind of stuff you can expect to see more of the movies default demographic in general - young males. If it's an artsy period costume drama then you are already setting your profits lower because the general demographics of moviegoers indicates you'll see fewer people than a shoot-em-up. And then once again the running time becomes signficant to getting people in to see YOUR movie instead of something else that is more likely to have another showing starting soon. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Forked Thread: Length of movies
Top