Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mercule" data-source="post: 4498728" data-attributes="member: 5100">Oh, how I've grown to hate that term -- simply because I hate the concept.Economy of actions is preventing a decent summoner, a decent enchanter, and some good magic items on occasion.I've started to accept that the &quot;economy of actions&quot; serves a narrative function for magic items -- at least in some ways.&nbsp; But I'm not sure how 4e will ever get a good summoner whilst constrained by their precious actions.&nbsp; Honestly, I've seen my 3e game slowed more by the ranger trying to decide whether to use Rapid Shot or Multi-shot or the wizard trying to figure out which spell to cast than by the summon-monkey druid moving himself, his companion, and his two summoned squids/eagles/elementals.My first request for 5e is to please change the socialist economy of actions to a free market.&nbsp; Please.&nbsp; Please.&nbsp; Please.&nbsp; It's not that the current classes play poorly.&nbsp; It's that it constrains future development.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mercule, post: 4498728, member: 5100"] Oh, how I've grown to hate that term -- simply because I hate the concept. Economy of actions is preventing a decent summoner, a decent enchanter, and some good magic items on occasion. I've started to accept that the "economy of actions" serves a narrative function for magic items -- at least in some ways. But I'm not sure how 4e will ever get a good summoner whilst constrained by their precious actions. Honestly, I've seen my 3e game slowed more by the ranger trying to decide whether to use Rapid Shot or Multi-shot or the wizard trying to figure out which spell to cast than by the summon-monkey druid moving himself, his companion, and his two summoned squids/eagles/elementals. My first request for 5e is to please change the socialist economy of actions to a free market. Please. Please. Please. It's not that the current classes play poorly. It's that it constrains future development. [/QUOTE]

Verification