Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jbear" data-source="post: 4537943" data-attributes="member: 75065">missed pages 4 and 5 of the thread, bleary eyes, need sleep nowww.... errrgh... so I apologise if someone else mentioned what I'm about to say there.&nbsp;Someone mentioned entangle as a missing spell and also the loss of the Druid class in particular... I suppose the bard and the monk can be tossed into the same bag for now.&nbsp;These classes have already been covered in TWO 3pp books and I think its a pretty safe bet the Druid will appear sooner or later (we already know bard and barbarian are both work in progress)....&nbsp;sorry just my 2 cents... also my comiserations to the OP who seems to have been thwarted in his attempt to create a constructive thread... although I havent read pages 4 or 5... maybe things took a turn.&nbsp;Another 2 cents... ehem... sry... also the idea of the OP to reflavour and tweak to make a player happy with his character doesnt seem like a bad idea to me. Certainly if I was you're DM with a proficiency with Longsword feat I'd be letting your Rogue use his powers... and no doe eyes would be necessary... all seems to come under that wonderful rule 'Say yes...' As for your bow, wellll I might throw in an adventure to find Rovin Hoof, renound brigand, thief and expert with a bow to get the right training or hell, just let you swap out proficiency with Xbow for Short bow and be done with it... again... no doe eyes necessary... actually doe eyes would be prohibited.&nbsp;Also I have seen a thread on the 4e House Rules boards about the creation of generic characters using a points buy for powers/abilities/weapon and Armour Training/HP etc... Seems like a viable option for someone who has there heart set on something and cant get no satisfaction.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jbear, post: 4537943, member: 75065"] missed pages 4 and 5 of the thread, bleary eyes, need sleep nowww.... errrgh... so I apologise if someone else mentioned what I'm about to say there. Someone mentioned entangle as a missing spell and also the loss of the Druid class in particular... I suppose the bard and the monk can be tossed into the same bag for now. These classes have already been covered in TWO 3pp books and I think its a pretty safe bet the Druid will appear sooner or later (we already know bard and barbarian are both work in progress).... sorry just my 2 cents... also my comiserations to the OP who seems to have been thwarted in his attempt to create a constructive thread... although I havent read pages 4 or 5... maybe things took a turn. Another 2 cents... ehem... sry... also the idea of the OP to reflavour and tweak to make a player happy with his character doesnt seem like a bad idea to me. Certainly if I was you're DM with a proficiency with Longsword feat I'd be letting your Rogue use his powers... and no doe eyes would be necessary... all seems to come under that wonderful rule 'Say yes...' As for your bow, wellll I might throw in an adventure to find Rovin Hoof, renound brigand, thief and expert with a bow to get the right training or hell, just let you swap out proficiency with Xbow for Short bow and be done with it... again... no doe eyes necessary... actually doe eyes would be prohibited. Also I have seen a thread on the 4e House Rules boards about the creation of generic characters using a points buy for powers/abilities/weapon and Armour Training/HP etc... Seems like a viable option for someone who has there heart set on something and cant get no satisfaction. [/QUOTE]

Verification