Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked Thread: [Ryan Dancey's D&D Death Spiral] - D&D doomed to cult status?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Korgoth" data-source="post: 4748417" data-attributes="member: 49613"><p>What's the cost of full-on "cult" status? Why does it matter? I don't think it's an issue of quality - I still maintain that the very best stuff produced for the hobby was basically a "garage" effort. So if D&D is reduced to a loose-knit association of hobbyists who make their own quirky stuff and publish/distribute it over the internet (like the Old School Renaissance) then we'll still have plenty of quality stuff out there.</p><p></p><p>The real pain of cult status is that it makes it harder to find players IRL. There will be a smaller pool, on average, of available players and it may be harder to get some games off the ground. The key in that situation is, as others have pointed about above, <em>simplicity</em>.</p><p></p><p>Look at WWII naval miniatures wargaming. There's a niche hobby for you! Now there are a number of rules sets from which to choose: General Quarters, Seekrieg, Victory at Sea, etc. Mongoose's Victory at Sea has been a bit of a boon for that hobby, despite its flaws (we're talking Mongoose here) as a set of rules. Why? Well, for one thing, it is simple. For another, it is very easy to house rule (such as Dave Manley's collection of house rules online).</p><p></p><p>So say I want to put together a battle game or even a campaign. I get some nice, cheap castings from Panzerschiffe and my simple set of rules. I'm not happy with some aspects of the rules, so I print up a 1-page sheet of house rules. Now I just need players.</p><p></p><p>I'm at an advantage in this if I have a simple set of rules. If I mention a game where you have to do trigonometry to fire a spread of torpedoes, it is going to be a harder sell. If I mention a game in which some guy in the local area got stuck in a 15-hour session and only fired one shot with an anemic 5" gun, it is going to be a harder sell. The larger commitment of time the rules and the individual sessions require, and the slower the pace of the game, the harder a sell it is going to be. After all, my fellow wargamers only have a limited amount of free time, and they ought to spend it well.</p><p></p><p>If I come in with a simpler, faster-playing ruleset then we can probably get something started. If someone says "I don't like how aircraft work in VaS" (who does?) then we can talk about house rules. But it's not too hard to get something written out that everyone can pretty much agree on. And then we get down to gaming.</p><p></p><p>In the end, it's not the gaming products themselves that get people to the table and keep them there. It's the interpersonal interactions. If I come across a complete newbie who is willing to try, say, a naval game, I better be able to put something in front of him that he can grok. And it better not take 20 hours to play. Likewise, in trying to get my fellow grognards to the table, I better be able to put something out there that everyone will at least sort of like and not feel like bamboo is being shoved under their fingernails every time we resolve a movement phase.</p><p></p><p>To be clear, it's not about having the "perfect" set of rules. That's going to be different for everybody. It's about having the "good enough" set of rules. And that set of rules should be accessible (complexity-wise), manageable (time-wise), and able to be heavily modded so that it can be tailored to the preferences of each unique group.</p><p></p><p>Part of D&D 4E's problem is that it is so rarefied. Not only is it extremely focused on tactical combat, the actual semantic content of the game world is divorced from the mechanics (why does this half-naked pirate have an AC of 21? Because he's a level-appropriate foe and your Striker is supposed to roll a 10+ to hit him. He could be wearing plate armor or he could be totally nude... no mechanical difference). So not only does a potential player have to <strong>really</strong> enjoy the tactical combat aspect, and enjoy 4E's particular take on tactical combat at that (it's dimensions of Wuxia, etc.), he also has to not care about the "fluff" of the setting and how it interacts with "Combat Mode". This is a series of design decisions that just whittles down the potential audience. I think there's no way it can be the "gateway game" to the hobby.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Korgoth, post: 4748417, member: 49613"] What's the cost of full-on "cult" status? Why does it matter? I don't think it's an issue of quality - I still maintain that the very best stuff produced for the hobby was basically a "garage" effort. So if D&D is reduced to a loose-knit association of hobbyists who make their own quirky stuff and publish/distribute it over the internet (like the Old School Renaissance) then we'll still have plenty of quality stuff out there. The real pain of cult status is that it makes it harder to find players IRL. There will be a smaller pool, on average, of available players and it may be harder to get some games off the ground. The key in that situation is, as others have pointed about above, [I]simplicity[/I]. Look at WWII naval miniatures wargaming. There's a niche hobby for you! Now there are a number of rules sets from which to choose: General Quarters, Seekrieg, Victory at Sea, etc. Mongoose's Victory at Sea has been a bit of a boon for that hobby, despite its flaws (we're talking Mongoose here) as a set of rules. Why? Well, for one thing, it is simple. For another, it is very easy to house rule (such as Dave Manley's collection of house rules online). So say I want to put together a battle game or even a campaign. I get some nice, cheap castings from Panzerschiffe and my simple set of rules. I'm not happy with some aspects of the rules, so I print up a 1-page sheet of house rules. Now I just need players. I'm at an advantage in this if I have a simple set of rules. If I mention a game where you have to do trigonometry to fire a spread of torpedoes, it is going to be a harder sell. If I mention a game in which some guy in the local area got stuck in a 15-hour session and only fired one shot with an anemic 5" gun, it is going to be a harder sell. The larger commitment of time the rules and the individual sessions require, and the slower the pace of the game, the harder a sell it is going to be. After all, my fellow wargamers only have a limited amount of free time, and they ought to spend it well. If I come in with a simpler, faster-playing ruleset then we can probably get something started. If someone says "I don't like how aircraft work in VaS" (who does?) then we can talk about house rules. But it's not too hard to get something written out that everyone can pretty much agree on. And then we get down to gaming. In the end, it's not the gaming products themselves that get people to the table and keep them there. It's the interpersonal interactions. If I come across a complete newbie who is willing to try, say, a naval game, I better be able to put something in front of him that he can grok. And it better not take 20 hours to play. Likewise, in trying to get my fellow grognards to the table, I better be able to put something out there that everyone will at least sort of like and not feel like bamboo is being shoved under their fingernails every time we resolve a movement phase. To be clear, it's not about having the "perfect" set of rules. That's going to be different for everybody. It's about having the "good enough" set of rules. And that set of rules should be accessible (complexity-wise), manageable (time-wise), and able to be heavily modded so that it can be tailored to the preferences of each unique group. Part of D&D 4E's problem is that it is so rarefied. Not only is it extremely focused on tactical combat, the actual semantic content of the game world is divorced from the mechanics (why does this half-naked pirate have an AC of 21? Because he's a level-appropriate foe and your Striker is supposed to roll a 10+ to hit him. He could be wearing plate armor or he could be totally nude... no mechanical difference). So not only does a potential player have to [B]really[/B] enjoy the tactical combat aspect, and enjoy 4E's particular take on tactical combat at that (it's dimensions of Wuxia, etc.), he also has to not care about the "fluff" of the setting and how it interacts with "Combat Mode". This is a series of design decisions that just whittles down the potential audience. I think there's no way it can be the "gateway game" to the hobby. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked Thread: [Ryan Dancey's D&D Death Spiral] - D&D doomed to cult status?
Top