Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Forked Thread: So, about Expertise...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AngryPurpleCyclops" data-source="post: 4713030" data-attributes="member: 82732"><p>Wow! Thanks for doing this and posting the results. The PC's are clearly weaker than one might expect for their level played by power gamer types. The number of magic items seems excessive when you think about the career of a pc (though a lot of what you get will become obsolete over the course of a career) and since each pc will be carrying only 1/5th of the items it's not over the top. </p><p></p><p>I'm very surprised the ravager and archons were killed so easily. Doresian was supposed to be converted to a flame creature was well (fire lord) so that the archons could teleport to him. </p><p></p><p>Did the room have a low ceiling? The ravager needs to be able to escape melee by vertical movement to maximize his effectiveness (I would probably never have him drop below 15' the entire encounter)</p><p></p><p>This encounter is weakened by the uniform damage type. Any kind of resistance to fire would obviously prevent the monsters from being as effective. </p><p></p><p>I do feel that half the dailies, and some daily magic item powers being used up is a significant encounter. I'm not at all convinced that epic is too easy given this example and results. The encounter clearly could be a lot tougher. The terrain wasn't such that the monsters had any real advantage and the level of synergy between the monsters was somewhat limited to the teleport feature. I also didn't really add any auras to the encounter.</p><p></p><p>Did Doresians power recharge more than once? Was he left alone in the early rounds? His high exp point cost and relatively low effectiveness might hurt this encounters design. Perhaps when modifying the creatures to make them fire creatures I would have modified doresian to give him an aura and or a ranged attack (he's pretty wimpy offensively for a level 27 elite). If we switch doresian out for 3 efreet flame striders and an efreet pyresinger I think it might make a better encounter. This drops the highest level threat down to a L+3 (lvl 25) controller but the fire teleport ability is now shared by all but the ravager and the pyresinger and now we have 4 creatures with aura's, lots of ongoing damage, ranged 20 immobilizing attacks... not to mention 8 combatants instead of 5 (vastly increasing focus fire opportunities for the bad guys).</p><p></p><p>really cool that you took the time to do this, hopefully encounters won't go over 2-3 hours at epic with pc's each running one guy etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AngryPurpleCyclops, post: 4713030, member: 82732"] Wow! Thanks for doing this and posting the results. The PC's are clearly weaker than one might expect for their level played by power gamer types. The number of magic items seems excessive when you think about the career of a pc (though a lot of what you get will become obsolete over the course of a career) and since each pc will be carrying only 1/5th of the items it's not over the top. I'm very surprised the ravager and archons were killed so easily. Doresian was supposed to be converted to a flame creature was well (fire lord) so that the archons could teleport to him. Did the room have a low ceiling? The ravager needs to be able to escape melee by vertical movement to maximize his effectiveness (I would probably never have him drop below 15' the entire encounter) This encounter is weakened by the uniform damage type. Any kind of resistance to fire would obviously prevent the monsters from being as effective. I do feel that half the dailies, and some daily magic item powers being used up is a significant encounter. I'm not at all convinced that epic is too easy given this example and results. The encounter clearly could be a lot tougher. The terrain wasn't such that the monsters had any real advantage and the level of synergy between the monsters was somewhat limited to the teleport feature. I also didn't really add any auras to the encounter. Did Doresians power recharge more than once? Was he left alone in the early rounds? His high exp point cost and relatively low effectiveness might hurt this encounters design. Perhaps when modifying the creatures to make them fire creatures I would have modified doresian to give him an aura and or a ranged attack (he's pretty wimpy offensively for a level 27 elite). If we switch doresian out for 3 efreet flame striders and an efreet pyresinger I think it might make a better encounter. This drops the highest level threat down to a L+3 (lvl 25) controller but the fire teleport ability is now shared by all but the ravager and the pyresinger and now we have 4 creatures with aura's, lots of ongoing damage, ranged 20 immobilizing attacks... not to mention 8 combatants instead of 5 (vastly increasing focus fire opportunities for the bad guys). really cool that you took the time to do this, hopefully encounters won't go over 2-3 hours at epic with pc's each running one guy etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Forked Thread: So, about Expertise...
Top