Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ThirdWizard" data-source="post: 4789703" data-attributes="member: 12037">I don't know where the idea that warlocks get more riders on their powers than sorcerers came from. Sorcerers get tons of riders on their powers and they have many more multi-target powers. So, while the warlock is hitting one enemy who he might get extra damage on (if he could curse it) and gets a rider on it, the sorcerer is hitting multiple enemies, always getting his extra damage on them, and getting a rider onto every single one.As a player of a warlock in a group I get to play in, I can see serious problems with the warlock's design. The reason I play him is because I'm going with the atypical conlock/fighter build, although I have concerns about that as well that I won't get into here. After seeing a friend of mine's sorcerer build where he was adding +19 (about +15 without cheese) to damage on every attack, I just can't see how anyone can claim the sorcerer isn't flat out better. Even if the warlock got to do curse damage to all targets all the time. Even if the warlock didn't have to curse enemies to do that damage. The sorcerer would still be flat out better.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ThirdWizard, post: 4789703, member: 12037"] I don't know where the idea that warlocks get more riders on their powers than sorcerers came from. Sorcerers get tons of riders on their powers [i]and[/i] they have many more multi-target powers. So, while the warlock is hitting one enemy who he might get extra damage on (if he could curse it) and gets a rider on it, the sorcerer is hitting multiple enemies, always getting his extra damage on them, and getting a rider onto every single one. As a player of a warlock in a group I get to play in, I can see serious problems with the warlock's design. The reason I play him is because I'm going with the atypical conlock/fighter build, although I have concerns about that as well that I won't get into here. After seeing a friend of mine's sorcerer build where he was adding +19 (about +15 without cheese) to damage on every attack, I just can't see how anyone can claim the sorcerer isn't flat out better. Even if the warlock got to do curse damage to all targets all the time. Even if the warlock didn't have to curse enemies to do that damage. The sorcerer would still be flat out better. [/QUOTE]

Verification