Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 5596735" data-attributes="member: 48965">Honestly? Quite a bit of money (I wish I hadn't spent on books and DDI)... and quite a bit of play time (I wish I could get back) over the past year. &nbsp;&nbsp;Please enlighten us... since it's an argument could you give some concrete examples where 4e gives objectively better advice on roleplaying and such... Here's a question for you... have you even read the advice in the 3.5 books I listed?&nbsp;&nbsp;Just two examples of what... subjective opinion is... subjective opinion.&nbsp;&nbsp;Again please give some concrete &quot;objective&quot; examples and perhaps your arguments would hold more weight... right now it just sonds like... &quot;I like the way 4e said it better...&quot; Which honestly has already shifted goalposts of your earlier claim that no editions &quot;did nothing of the sort&quot; ... which I've already proven is false.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 5596735, member: 48965"] Honestly? Quite a bit of money (I wish I hadn't spent on books and DDI)... and quite a bit of play time (I wish I could get back) over the past year. Please enlighten us... since it's an argument could you give some concrete examples where 4e gives [B]objectively[/B] better advice on roleplaying and such... Here's a question for you... have you even read the advice in the 3.5 books I listed? Just two examples of what... subjective opinion is... subjective opinion. Again please give some concrete "objective" examples and perhaps your arguments would hold more weight... right now it just sonds like... "I like the way 4e said it better..." Which honestly has already shifted goalposts of your earlier claim that no editions "did nothing of the sort" ... which I've already proven is false. [/QUOTE]

Verification