Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked Thread: What is the difference between Science Fiction and Fantasy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 4365107" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>I don't think it is a big of killer as all that. When I first invented the definitions and started refining them, my main goal was to be able to distinguish science fiction from fantasy. Everyone seemed to agree that it was something that they could recognize and distinguish from each other and there was a broad agreement between different observers as to what fit into which category, but no one seemed to be able to explain how they were recognizing the two things.</p><p></p><p>Like pornography and other slippery terms, this seemed to me to imply a situation where authorial intent and theme played at least as big of a role as content.</p><p></p><p>Separating the two according to what purposes the fantastic elements of the story were put to solved the problem. It was only after that I begin to explore the problem that the definitions were leaking out into other areas. At first I considered this a feature rather than a bug, because I could show that science fiction had a rich history and wasn't just some passing fad defined - as some texts I was reading at the time would have it - solely by novelty or a narrow set of tropes (robots, lasers, spaceships). This is something I still believe, as evidenced by the fact I will defend 'Frankenstein' as the first modern science fiction story and my not completely in jest claim that Gilgamesh is in conception at least in part a science fiction story.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think my approach settles the first question, "what diagnostic features <strong>separate</strong> Fantasy as a modern literary genre (not in the more generic definition of the word) from Science Fiction", fairly nicely. It's the part about "other literary genres" that my conventional formulation has problems with.</p><p></p><p>But I don't think it is in any fashion a lethal problem. I think all I need is to more clearly define 'fantastic elements'. For example, I pointed out that Javier from 'Les Miserables' fits my definition of an embodied abstract ethical idea, and hense puts 'Les Miserables' in the category of fantasy by my definition. And, while I think there is something important about the story revealed in that analysis, the story isn't like what we normally think of as fantasy because none of the fantastic elements require a full suspension of disbelief on our part. Javier, while obviously exagerated in his self-discipline, persistance, and commitment to the ideas of justice to a degree which is almost inhuman, is nonetheless not an impossible or necessarily even an improbable character. Even though they are far out of the ordinary, rare individuals do possess such exagerrated virtues (or vices). Jean Valjeans extraordinary commitment and near superhuman strength is likewise within the realm of possibility. Mystical events like the Messianic boy with the sou who leads to Jean Valjeans conversion, or the providential fate of literally falling into the nunnery just as Eponine needs an education and finding the gardener is a man whom he formerly saved are obviously meant to be supernatural, but neither are they unexplainable as ordinary coincidence.</p><p></p><p>In short, all I need to do to tighten up my circle is to introduce some good definition of the fantastic. I don't have it yet, but I have some ideas what it would be like. With such a definition, I think it's pretty obvious I can stop the unlimited leak of fantasy into less fantastic genera's, while simultaneously keeping my ability to distinguish between sci-fi and fantasy - something you can't do with definitions that depend <em>solely</em> on defining the fantastic as some other people more famous than me have proposed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 4365107, member: 4937"] I don't think it is a big of killer as all that. When I first invented the definitions and started refining them, my main goal was to be able to distinguish science fiction from fantasy. Everyone seemed to agree that it was something that they could recognize and distinguish from each other and there was a broad agreement between different observers as to what fit into which category, but no one seemed to be able to explain how they were recognizing the two things. Like pornography and other slippery terms, this seemed to me to imply a situation where authorial intent and theme played at least as big of a role as content. Separating the two according to what purposes the fantastic elements of the story were put to solved the problem. It was only after that I begin to explore the problem that the definitions were leaking out into other areas. At first I considered this a feature rather than a bug, because I could show that science fiction had a rich history and wasn't just some passing fad defined - as some texts I was reading at the time would have it - solely by novelty or a narrow set of tropes (robots, lasers, spaceships). This is something I still believe, as evidenced by the fact I will defend 'Frankenstein' as the first modern science fiction story and my not completely in jest claim that Gilgamesh is in conception at least in part a science fiction story. I think my approach settles the first question, "what diagnostic features [b]separate[/b] Fantasy as a modern literary genre (not in the more generic definition of the word) from Science Fiction", fairly nicely. It's the part about "other literary genres" that my conventional formulation has problems with. But I don't think it is in any fashion a lethal problem. I think all I need is to more clearly define 'fantastic elements'. For example, I pointed out that Javier from 'Les Miserables' fits my definition of an embodied abstract ethical idea, and hense puts 'Les Miserables' in the category of fantasy by my definition. And, while I think there is something important about the story revealed in that analysis, the story isn't like what we normally think of as fantasy because none of the fantastic elements require a full suspension of disbelief on our part. Javier, while obviously exagerated in his self-discipline, persistance, and commitment to the ideas of justice to a degree which is almost inhuman, is nonetheless not an impossible or necessarily even an improbable character. Even though they are far out of the ordinary, rare individuals do possess such exagerrated virtues (or vices). Jean Valjeans extraordinary commitment and near superhuman strength is likewise within the realm of possibility. Mystical events like the Messianic boy with the sou who leads to Jean Valjeans conversion, or the providential fate of literally falling into the nunnery just as Eponine needs an education and finding the gardener is a man whom he formerly saved are obviously meant to be supernatural, but neither are they unexplainable as ordinary coincidence. In short, all I need to do to tighten up my circle is to introduce some good definition of the fantastic. I don't have it yet, but I have some ideas what it would be like. With such a definition, I think it's pretty obvious I can stop the unlimited leak of fantasy into less fantastic genera's, while simultaneously keeping my ability to distinguish between sci-fi and fantasy - something you can't do with definitions that depend [i]solely[/i] on defining the fantastic as some other people more famous than me have proposed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked Thread: What is the difference between Science Fiction and Fantasy?
Top