Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Corjay" data-source="post: 4442545" data-attributes="member: 52839"><p>Yeah, you keep saying that, and I keep correcting you. See the thing is that you're coming from the view that if one thing in the GSL is bad, then it's all bad. I am coming from the view that good parts and bad parts can coexist in the same document. But here's the kicker: I recognize that it only take one bad thing to make the whole document unusable. But that doesn't change the fact that other parts can still be good. If you trade out the bad things for good things, then there's no reason to trade out the other parts that are good just because they co-existed at one time next to a bad part. It's not like the badness of any one part is insipid so that it infects the good parts like a bad apple.  The GSL is not acceptable in its current incarnation. Replace the few bad parts of the GSL with good parts and the GSL can succeed. I do not support the GSL in its current form. I do support its potential if the bad parts are replaced.</p></blockquote><p></p>