Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Corjay" data-source="post: 4461502" data-attributes="member: 52839">My being lost on RangerREG's points is probably why you're lost on my points. If I don't think his points affect the conversation, then my points regarding his points aren't going to affect that conversation either.The Lorraine Williams point is still moot. Yes, a business head can make mistakes. No one was saying they can't. If you want to establish a stream of mistakes by the head, then you need to show examples (We're all well familiar with the mistakes they've made over the last year regarding Gleemax and D&D that lead to the reorganization, but I mean over the extended time that seems to be suggested here, as well as connecting those decisions to the President of WOTC). Perhaps that's what the erotica point was about, but I'm not seeing it, probably because I don't know the particulars regarding that case. Perhaps if you all could spell out the particulars of that case that make it a bad business decision, I might understand it better. But the only discussion that I've seen on it has simply mentioned that they sued a company for making an erotica game that may or may not have violated the OGL. Give me some background or an article, and maybe I can make more of it. Even just summarize what the mistake was. It just seems like a total non sequitur to me.</blockquote>