Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked Thread: What is WOTC's Goal with the GSL?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Najo" data-source="post: 4472672" data-attributes="member: 9959"><p>This thread seems to be all over the place. I've read all of it, and it seems the discussion is not staying on the subject of what is WOTC's goal with the GSL. So instead of responding to one of the tagents in the thread, I am going to give me own two cents on the original question:</p><p></p><p>I think the GSL has a number of goals for WOTC:</p><p></p><p>1. Creating core rulebook sales by referencing official rule books instead of referencing online, free SRD rules.</p><p></p><p>2. Spread the D&D brand, by allowing the D&D logo to be printed on GSL products. In fact, the GSL logo is designed to not mesh with a company's graphic design with its big white box and extra text around the D&D logo. I actually find the GSL logo unprofessional and its primary purpose is to draw attention to the D&D logo instead of being a professional looking mark of quality.</p><p></p><p>3. Kill off the OGL by getting as many 3PP moved over to the 4e GSL and blocking their product lines from returning to 3.x.</p><p></p><p>4. If WOTC's intentions are not entirely above board, then the GSL also ruins 3PP when the license is changed severely, or pulled from them without warning. Without any safe harbor clause, the current GSL can destroy a 3PP at WOTC's whim.</p><p></p><p>When the revision is released, if it either a) blocks returning to the OGL or b) does not have safe harbor properties to protect publishers from losing their rights to use the liscense while compliant with the license, and if they do lose the license a way to restore complience, then I would highly question WOTC's intentions.</p><p></p><p>Likewise, even with an air tight GSL, if it is not edition proof (i.e. negated by WOTC going to 5e) then it still holds the dangers of the current GSL.</p><p></p><p>If WOTC's intentions are honorable, then the GSL's goal is to allow 3PP to help build the D&D brand and protect WOTC without any loopholes.</p><p></p><p>If WOTC is trying to rid themselves of the 3PP, then they are going to make the 4e GSL inticing with some limited safe horbors, but it will still kill the 3PP right to return to the OGL. Even if it doesn't, if enough 3PP go to the 4e GSL, they will indirectly kill the OGL support. Then, when all is said and done, 5e could wipe out any 3PP support entirely and by that point OGL would be fully dead.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Najo, post: 4472672, member: 9959"] This thread seems to be all over the place. I've read all of it, and it seems the discussion is not staying on the subject of what is WOTC's goal with the GSL. So instead of responding to one of the tagents in the thread, I am going to give me own two cents on the original question: I think the GSL has a number of goals for WOTC: 1. Creating core rulebook sales by referencing official rule books instead of referencing online, free SRD rules. 2. Spread the D&D brand, by allowing the D&D logo to be printed on GSL products. In fact, the GSL logo is designed to not mesh with a company's graphic design with its big white box and extra text around the D&D logo. I actually find the GSL logo unprofessional and its primary purpose is to draw attention to the D&D logo instead of being a professional looking mark of quality. 3. Kill off the OGL by getting as many 3PP moved over to the 4e GSL and blocking their product lines from returning to 3.x. 4. If WOTC's intentions are not entirely above board, then the GSL also ruins 3PP when the license is changed severely, or pulled from them without warning. Without any safe harbor clause, the current GSL can destroy a 3PP at WOTC's whim. When the revision is released, if it either a) blocks returning to the OGL or b) does not have safe harbor properties to protect publishers from losing their rights to use the liscense while compliant with the license, and if they do lose the license a way to restore complience, then I would highly question WOTC's intentions. Likewise, even with an air tight GSL, if it is not edition proof (i.e. negated by WOTC going to 5e) then it still holds the dangers of the current GSL. If WOTC's intentions are honorable, then the GSL's goal is to allow 3PP to help build the D&D brand and protect WOTC without any loopholes. If WOTC is trying to rid themselves of the 3PP, then they are going to make the 4e GSL inticing with some limited safe horbors, but it will still kill the 3PP right to return to the OGL. Even if it doesn't, if enough 3PP go to the 4e GSL, they will indirectly kill the OGL support. Then, when all is said and done, 5e could wipe out any 3PP support entirely and by that point OGL would be fully dead. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked Thread: What is WOTC's Goal with the GSL?
Top