Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Formulating Magical Research
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ValhallaGH" data-source="post: 5048935" data-attributes="member: 41187"><p>Hawken, did you even read the document attached to the first post? Because it really reads like you just waited for me to post some details and analysis, and then quote it without bothering to find out why the details I mentioned were mentioned. Which is odd, given that it <em>is</em> just a single page and very cleanly written.*</p><p>Asking for the OP to clarify his problems and issues is one thing. That's a great way to get more detail so that you can figure out how to best help solve those issues and help make his games more fun.</p><p>Bashing the OP for daring to modify the existing rules is a totally different issue, and not a good one.</p><p></p><p></p><p>*It is a single page that is conceited enough to think that it covers every case, and oddly enough written that I almost asked "how do I cost weapons using this" but that's another issue entirely. </p><p>Any engineer (*raises hand*) or combat veteran (*raises hand*) can tell you that you can <strong><em>Never</em></strong> plan for all possibilities, especially when humans are involved. Presuming otherwise is arrogance setting you up for failure, potentially catastrophic failure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ValhallaGH, post: 5048935, member: 41187"] Hawken, did you even read the document attached to the first post? Because it really reads like you just waited for me to post some details and analysis, and then quote it without bothering to find out why the details I mentioned were mentioned. Which is odd, given that it [I]is[/I] just a single page and very cleanly written.* Asking for the OP to clarify his problems and issues is one thing. That's a great way to get more detail so that you can figure out how to best help solve those issues and help make his games more fun. Bashing the OP for daring to modify the existing rules is a totally different issue, and not a good one. *It is a single page that is conceited enough to think that it covers every case, and oddly enough written that I almost asked "how do I cost weapons using this" but that's another issue entirely. Any engineer (*raises hand*) or combat veteran (*raises hand*) can tell you that you can [B][I]Never[/I][/B] plan for all possibilities, especially when humans are involved. Presuming otherwise is arrogance setting you up for failure, potentially catastrophic failure. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Formulating Magical Research
Top