Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Forsaker question...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 372926" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>The answer is unclear. The ability description says the weapon functions <em>as if</em> it were a natural weapon for overcoming damage reduction. The natural weapon entry says the weapon counts as a type that ignores its own <em>innate</em> damage reduction, but not for spells (which are transient) such as stoneskin's damage reduction. Forsaker damage reduction is an ability, not necessarily innate. Innate abilities are generally those that are determined by factors present in an individual from birth (like natural weapons), and not transient things that are learned from experience or which are turned on and off. The Forsaker ability, however, does not come from birth, but is a learned ability with experience, that turns on and off based on his actions or inactions. The Forsaker's ability, thertefore, does not function exactly like a natural weapon for purposes of overcoming damage reduction (hence the modifier <em>as if</em> in the ability description). </p><p></p><p>I really do not think it is clear that the Forsaker's damage reduction must be active for this ability to be active. The Forsaker has the ability, at all times, to trigger the damage reduction (by destroying magic). Therefore, you could argue the ability functions <em>as if</em> it were an innate and always present (though perhaps passive at the moment) damage reduction and therefore the ability to overcome damage reduction as if the Forsaker had a natural weapon is always on. </p><p></p><p>I think this is a good case for sage advice, personally.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 372926, member: 2525"] The answer is unclear. The ability description says the weapon functions [i]as if[/i] it were a natural weapon for overcoming damage reduction. The natural weapon entry says the weapon counts as a type that ignores its own [i]innate[/i] damage reduction, but not for spells (which are transient) such as stoneskin's damage reduction. Forsaker damage reduction is an ability, not necessarily innate. Innate abilities are generally those that are determined by factors present in an individual from birth (like natural weapons), and not transient things that are learned from experience or which are turned on and off. The Forsaker ability, however, does not come from birth, but is a learned ability with experience, that turns on and off based on his actions or inactions. The Forsaker's ability, thertefore, does not function exactly like a natural weapon for purposes of overcoming damage reduction (hence the modifier [i]as if[/i] in the ability description). I really do not think it is clear that the Forsaker's damage reduction must be active for this ability to be active. The Forsaker has the ability, at all times, to trigger the damage reduction (by destroying magic). Therefore, you could argue the ability functions [i]as if[/i] it were an innate and always present (though perhaps passive at the moment) damage reduction and therefore the ability to overcome damage reduction as if the Forsaker had a natural weapon is always on. I think this is a good case for sage advice, personally. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Forsaker question...
Top