Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Foundry VTT Responds to OGL 1.2 Draft
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steel_Wind" data-source="post: 8915112" data-attributes="member: 20741"><p>Sure they do. <strong><em>They can just ignore it and go on publishing</em></strong>. There is a color of right under the OGL 1.0a, it's not like there is any realistic prospect of a jail sentence at the end of somebody's commercial calculus. It's just money.</p><p></p><p>Is WotC likely to take any action at all in response? No and <em>hell no</em>, imo. If WotC were going to do anything about that in court, they would have done that in 2009 or 2010 -- or at some point before they withdrew 4th ed from the market. Which is to say: when it had a commercial impact upon their real financial interests.</p><p></p><p>WotC doesn't really care about that now. The last thing WotC wants to do is pick a fight they don't have to win with Paizo -- who can afford to fight with them and has facts, evidence and witnesses on their side. Just because somebody can bring a lawsuit does not mean that they will do so. Lawsuits are brought for commercial reasons, not to make an academic point.</p><p></p><p><em>Follow the money. </em>There's no money there for WotC. The risk of WotC commencing litigation related to SRD 3.5 based material, realistically assessed, are very, (if not <em>exceedingly) </em>low, imo.</p><p></p><p>The opinion that really matters though are those of the 3pp(s) who decide to roll the dice and take the gamble.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steel_Wind, post: 8915112, member: 20741"] Sure they do. [B][I]They can just ignore it and go on publishing[/I][/B]. There is a color of right under the OGL 1.0a, it's not like there is any realistic prospect of a jail sentence at the end of somebody's commercial calculus. It's just money. Is WotC likely to take any action at all in response? No and [I]hell no[/I], imo. If WotC were going to do anything about that in court, they would have done that in 2009 or 2010 -- or at some point before they withdrew 4th ed from the market. Which is to say: when it had a commercial impact upon their real financial interests. WotC doesn't really care about that now. The last thing WotC wants to do is pick a fight they don't have to win with Paizo -- who can afford to fight with them and has facts, evidence and witnesses on their side. Just because somebody can bring a lawsuit does not mean that they will do so. Lawsuits are brought for commercial reasons, not to make an academic point. [I]Follow the money. [/I]There's no money there for WotC. The risk of WotC commencing litigation related to SRD 3.5 based material, realistically assessed, are very, (if not [I]exceedingly) [/I]low, imo. The opinion that really matters though are those of the 3pp(s) who decide to roll the dice and take the gamble. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
Foundry VTT Responds to OGL 1.2 Draft
Top