Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Free 60+ page Guide to Sword & Sorcery for 5E D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paid a bod yn dwp" data-source="post: 8214169" data-attributes="member: 6872763"><p>Pretty sure this is a no go as already stated by Xoth. 5e players looking for a 5e game expect some certainties in their 5e games. Some aspects are crucial to the perception of playing 5e, I think Hp progression is one of them, even if many agree that it’s an abstraction that can get in the way of certain story telling narratives.</p><p></p><p>Many previous additions of D&D going back to AD&D were aware of the limitation of the HP abstraction, and how it could take the drama out of certain scenarios .Look at the AD&D assassins ability - that is actually intended to be applicable to all classes in conditional circumstances, such as attacking a sleeping target.</p><p></p><p>Doing big damage is the other method, but again that changes the traditional expectations of 5e players too much IMO, and the design of some classes extra damage would be lost in the multiplication.</p><p></p><p>What’s required is something that can slot into the existing 5e framework, without having to alter the rest of the game. Which is what’s been arrived at. Standard 5e models high heroic fantasy, it’s not designed to model S&S which has a darker bloodier edge to it.</p><p>I think we are still very far away from the more simulationist approach of RuneQuest, or the very grim and gritty wfrp. This is clearly still DnD in its cinematic style, it’s far from Rq and wfrp.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Well there are different opinions and how to create that S&S atmosphere.</p><p></p><p>If you want a high heroic game where there is little danger after 6th level then use 5e as is, that’s its standard intended mode.</p><p></p><p>If you wish to alter that expectation slightly and add in some more S&S thrill, danger, and excitement, then I think Xoths suggestion does that elegantly without redesigning 5e. The death saves are already a safety net for player characters in 5e. Changing damage expectations, or hp progression is going to be too big a structural change for the majority of 5e players. Take a look at other 5e designers - AIME, Trudvang, symbaroum, Beowulf. The changes they make are slight but impactful, the basis of 5e remains the same. 5 torches deep is an example of a game where the structure of 5e has been overhauled, low hitpoints more in line with b/x, but it becomes a different game, it’s no longer 5e.</p><p></p><p>Besides it’s already been pointed out as being an optional rule. Really can’t see the problem here. Optional means optional does it not? That’s the the benefit of working off of a strong but malleable 5e frame work. DMG is full of such suggestions, but they are all optional.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paid a bod yn dwp, post: 8214169, member: 6872763"] Pretty sure this is a no go as already stated by Xoth. 5e players looking for a 5e game expect some certainties in their 5e games. Some aspects are crucial to the perception of playing 5e, I think Hp progression is one of them, even if many agree that it’s an abstraction that can get in the way of certain story telling narratives. Many previous additions of D&D going back to AD&D were aware of the limitation of the HP abstraction, and how it could take the drama out of certain scenarios .Look at the AD&D assassins ability - that is actually intended to be applicable to all classes in conditional circumstances, such as attacking a sleeping target. Doing big damage is the other method, but again that changes the traditional expectations of 5e players too much IMO, and the design of some classes extra damage would be lost in the multiplication. What’s required is something that can slot into the existing 5e framework, without having to alter the rest of the game. Which is what’s been arrived at. Standard 5e models high heroic fantasy, it’s not designed to model S&S which has a darker bloodier edge to it. I think we are still very far away from the more simulationist approach of RuneQuest, or the very grim and gritty wfrp. This is clearly still DnD in its cinematic style, it’s far from Rq and wfrp. Well there are different opinions and how to create that S&S atmosphere. If you want a high heroic game where there is little danger after 6th level then use 5e as is, that’s its standard intended mode. If you wish to alter that expectation slightly and add in some more S&S thrill, danger, and excitement, then I think Xoths suggestion does that elegantly without redesigning 5e. The death saves are already a safety net for player characters in 5e. Changing damage expectations, or hp progression is going to be too big a structural change for the majority of 5e players. Take a look at other 5e designers - AIME, Trudvang, symbaroum, Beowulf. The changes they make are slight but impactful, the basis of 5e remains the same. 5 torches deep is an example of a game where the structure of 5e has been overhauled, low hitpoints more in line with b/x, but it becomes a different game, it’s no longer 5e. Besides it’s already been pointed out as being an optional rule. Really can’t see the problem here. Optional means optional does it not? That’s the the benefit of working off of a strong but malleable 5e frame work. DMG is full of such suggestions, but they are all optional. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Free 60+ page Guide to Sword & Sorcery for 5E D&D
Top