Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Paid a bod yn dwp" data-source="post: 8215667" data-attributes="member: 6872763">I disagreed, it’d be odd to agree with your reasoning if that wasn’t also my belief.If you’re looking for validation, I think you and S’mon have made good points on the Conan stories, and I haven’t disputed those. What I have disputed is your opinion of Xoths approach and design of his optional rules. I’ve also made the point that the S&S genre is a broad church and there are varied valid ways of expressing the genre in a game of 5e. It seems we both have different things we’d like to emphasis, which is cool. It also seems to me that we are both catered for thanks to Xoth’s approach to his game.Now if you wish to continue to tell me how I’m wrong, then we probably won’t reach agreement there. Be more constructive to acknowledge differences of opinion, and move on.I’ve mentioned that I agreed with your analysis of magic in S&S. So that’s apoint of agreement.I also liked S’mon point about increasing the level of threat of the foes.We also know that Xoth isn’t going to make big upheavals to the 5e system, like changing hp’s per level, or increasing general weapon damage. He wants to keep the game as compatible to 5e as possible to (understandably) reach that audience, hence my comment. I said that not to shut off debate, but to save us all time and effort in where we direct focus for future discussions.If you’re looking for something much more Conan focused there’s already a bespoke Conan game which is pretty decent. Well worth a look if you haven’t already.</blockquote>

Verification