Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Free RPG day Ebberon Black Ooze escape
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hellcow" data-source="post: 4838787" data-attributes="member: 15800"><p>As printed, the encounter really doesn't run the way I planned it. However, I have to accept responsibility for the fact that my tactics section was quite long, and the editor had to squeeze it down to fit the encounter on one page. The problem is that they refocused it to be a purely combat encounter, whereas for me, it's really supposed to be flavor. Again, in <em>Fellowship of the Ring</em>, they don't KILL the Watcher in the Water - they need to escape from it. </p><p></p><p>So... [spoiler] My original intent was to give the PCs a chance to get into the room before the darkness acts. It's supposed to be a bit of "The room is utterly dark and no light will penetrate it... what do you do?" before combat begins. When combat DOES begin, you want a moment of "What IS this?" as the darkness becomes solid around you. I wouldn't play it especially tactically sharp (singling out the weakest characters) because it isn't really a sentient thing; it's hungry darkness. The original tactics specifically called out that radiant damage infuriated it and would draw it away from other targets - and again, that it wouldn't venture too close to the edge of the room.</p><p></p><p>With that said, in terms of freeing an engulfed character who can't get away on his own, with Eberron, my goal is always to think of what would make a good scene in a movie or book, and to reward creative thinking. I'd PERSONALLY allow the artificer to use thunder armor to free himself, because I can <em>see</em> it in my mind... the darkness solidifying around the character and then shattering as the concussive force explodes from his armor. I'd also definitely allow a PC to either help an adjacent engulfed PC escape as a move action (using Athletics against the darkness and leaving the PC adjacent to the darkness) or to grab the PC as a standard action against the defense of the darkness, but then being able to use a move action to run, dragging the grabbed character. Lostsoul's idea is also an interesting one. As it's clearly stated that no light can penetrate the gloom, I wouldn't let a sunrod alone provide complete protection; but I might allow a character flinging a sunrod at the darkness to distract it and give the character trapped inside a bonus to an escape check. Depending on how the scene was playing out, I might allow a character using a radiant attack to spend an action point to make the radiance even more brilliant and add a push effect to that one attack... but I've always been one to allow action points to perform dramatic actions outside the rules. [/spoiler]</p><p></p><p>Anyhow, I am sad this encounter got shifted from my original intent and has become a source of frustration, though as I said, I have to take responsibility for overwriting; if I'd made my point more concisely it might not have been edited in the first place. If you are planning to run the adventure but haven't yet, I'd suggest that you keep these comments in mind.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hellcow, post: 4838787, member: 15800"] As printed, the encounter really doesn't run the way I planned it. However, I have to accept responsibility for the fact that my tactics section was quite long, and the editor had to squeeze it down to fit the encounter on one page. The problem is that they refocused it to be a purely combat encounter, whereas for me, it's really supposed to be flavor. Again, in [i]Fellowship of the Ring[/i], they don't KILL the Watcher in the Water - they need to escape from it. So... [spoiler] My original intent was to give the PCs a chance to get into the room before the darkness acts. It's supposed to be a bit of "The room is utterly dark and no light will penetrate it... what do you do?" before combat begins. When combat DOES begin, you want a moment of "What IS this?" as the darkness becomes solid around you. I wouldn't play it especially tactically sharp (singling out the weakest characters) because it isn't really a sentient thing; it's hungry darkness. The original tactics specifically called out that radiant damage infuriated it and would draw it away from other targets - and again, that it wouldn't venture too close to the edge of the room. With that said, in terms of freeing an engulfed character who can't get away on his own, with Eberron, my goal is always to think of what would make a good scene in a movie or book, and to reward creative thinking. I'd PERSONALLY allow the artificer to use thunder armor to free himself, because I can [i]see[/i] it in my mind... the darkness solidifying around the character and then shattering as the concussive force explodes from his armor. I'd also definitely allow a PC to either help an adjacent engulfed PC escape as a move action (using Athletics against the darkness and leaving the PC adjacent to the darkness) or to grab the PC as a standard action against the defense of the darkness, but then being able to use a move action to run, dragging the grabbed character. Lostsoul's idea is also an interesting one. As it's clearly stated that no light can penetrate the gloom, I wouldn't let a sunrod alone provide complete protection; but I might allow a character flinging a sunrod at the darkness to distract it and give the character trapped inside a bonus to an escape check. Depending on how the scene was playing out, I might allow a character using a radiant attack to spend an action point to make the radiance even more brilliant and add a push effect to that one attack... but I've always been one to allow action points to perform dramatic actions outside the rules. [/spoiler] Anyhow, I am sad this encounter got shifted from my original intent and has become a source of frustration, though as I said, I have to take responsibility for overwriting; if I'd made my point more concisely it might not have been edited in the first place. If you are planning to run the adventure but haven't yet, I'd suggest that you keep these comments in mind. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Free RPG day Ebberon Black Ooze escape
Top