Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6144902" data-attributes="member: 48965">Please don't "translate" what I'm posting. If something is unclear ask me. Well as billd91 posted he didn't seem to be all that upset about it at the end of the day... so I'll go with that as opposed to your auto-knowledge of the thinking of a player you've never met.I'm unclear as to your point here (see how that works as opposed to me choosing to "translate" it). Are you saying the two downed PC's with 3 still up was a larger blow to one side than the monster with around 400 hp's taking a 100 point hit and then another hit for 150 (250) total? I think we'd need alot more information to make an assertion like that.Yeah, just like in alot of mythology and fantasy literature, go figure that... again I'm unclear on your point.You really don't have enough information to make this blanket statement... you don't even know what the hit point totals were... and just in case you missed it... The PC's did win, even with Jim attacking them and trying to stop them from beating the solo.Semantics, and I was speaking as to how the DM may have viewed it when making the decision initially... now given his history with Jim he may have also been thinking this was just another "Jim episode" of which there had been many in the camapign... that's one of the problems of always acting out... no one knows when to take your tantrums seriously.Again Jim has a history of acting out... you learn to ignore it after awhile when it's a continuous thing. How was the DM supposed to know this time Jim was REALLY deadly serious as opposed to just messing the game up as usual?</blockquote>

Verification