Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Free Will and Story
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ahnehnois" data-source="post: 6147748" data-attributes="member: 17106"><p>It's worth noting that this likely <em>wasn't</em> the intent. The spell is about revealing invisible or concealed things. The blinding is a side effect, one that was probably put in as a nod to "realism" and that whoever wrote the spell clearly underestimated.</p><p></p><p>Do you really think that overpowered abilities are intended to be so? No one's defending Glitterdust as a well-written spell. Out of several hundred (or thousand, going beyond core) there are going to be some spells that don't work as intended. You seem remarkably forgiving of mistakes in your game of choice (of which there are many, by any measure), is it so strange to you that DMs and players are willing to accept and deal with the rates of error in games with better editing but higher (and riskier) aspirations?</p><p></p><p>No, not because his encounter is trashed. Because the spell itself is inappropriate. The encounter may or may not be trashed, and that isn't really the point. Sometimes encounters are trashed for good reasons and you let it play out and move on. Other times it exposes a flaw in the system, and you have to decide how to deal with the flaw.</p><p></p><p>...and isn't being treated as if he has. He's not getting punished (though you seem to be implying that), his actions are being adjudicated by the person whose job description it is to adjudicate them.</p><p></p><p>Your loss, I suspect, disregarding that ridiculous term. But there are plenty of games out there for you regardless.</p><p></p><p></p><p>But why would he if he has someone else to do similar functions? Assuming the wizard has a regular party of companions, it makes sense for him to learn spells that expand upon or complement the other characters' abilities. Trying to replace them is not a logical goal, regardless of whether it is possible or not. It makes the party as a whole less powerful because the wizard is wasting resources that could be used elsewhere.</p><p></p><p>BTW Arcane Eye is one of those spells I don't know if I've ever seen anyone choose. I couldn't even remember what level it was, and I'm a 3e encyclopedia.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ahnehnois, post: 6147748, member: 17106"] It's worth noting that this likely [I]wasn't[/I] the intent. The spell is about revealing invisible or concealed things. The blinding is a side effect, one that was probably put in as a nod to "realism" and that whoever wrote the spell clearly underestimated. Do you really think that overpowered abilities are intended to be so? No one's defending Glitterdust as a well-written spell. Out of several hundred (or thousand, going beyond core) there are going to be some spells that don't work as intended. You seem remarkably forgiving of mistakes in your game of choice (of which there are many, by any measure), is it so strange to you that DMs and players are willing to accept and deal with the rates of error in games with better editing but higher (and riskier) aspirations? No, not because his encounter is trashed. Because the spell itself is inappropriate. The encounter may or may not be trashed, and that isn't really the point. Sometimes encounters are trashed for good reasons and you let it play out and move on. Other times it exposes a flaw in the system, and you have to decide how to deal with the flaw. ...and isn't being treated as if he has. He's not getting punished (though you seem to be implying that), his actions are being adjudicated by the person whose job description it is to adjudicate them. Your loss, I suspect, disregarding that ridiculous term. But there are plenty of games out there for you regardless. But why would he if he has someone else to do similar functions? Assuming the wizard has a regular party of companions, it makes sense for him to learn spells that expand upon or complement the other characters' abilities. Trying to replace them is not a logical goal, regardless of whether it is possible or not. It makes the party as a whole less powerful because the wizard is wasting resources that could be used elsewhere. BTW Arcane Eye is one of those spells I don't know if I've ever seen anyone choose. I couldn't even remember what level it was, and I'm a 3e encyclopedia. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Free Will and Story
Top