Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="RandomPrecision" data-source="post: 2352407" data-attributes="member: 29267">I don't think "The spell also allows the subject to move and attack normally while underwater, even with slashing weapons such as axes and swords or with bludgeoning weapons such as flails, hammers, and maces, provided that the weapon is wielded in the hand rather than hurled. The freedom of movement spell does not, however, allow water breathing." is redundant, but I don't think it means you sink rapidly. See, it doesn't mean you can swim just like before, it means you can move and attack normally, despite the usual resistance of water.Consider - Bob the mage can swim.  Bob casts Freedom of Movement on himself.  Apparently, he sinks.  Why would a spell called Freedom of Movement restrict his actions thusly?</blockquote>