Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="RangerWickett" data-source="post: 5066149" data-attributes="member: 63">Hi. And yes, before War of the Burning Sky, the various Elements of Magic versions (from Cyberzombie's original to my two published and one dustbin version) were the game products I most enjoyed working on. I love playing with magic.My players used to say I didn't run D&D, though. I ran "Spellcasters are Cool."I discovered the same thing. The last 3e campaign I ran had 6 PCs. It started with one spellcaster and ended with four. And the non-mage fighter I granted the ability to shapeshift into four different elemental forms, whereas the ranger got a bow whose arrows could store the spells of the other PCs.Thank you. I'm always thrilled to hear that people enjoyed the book, and I hope it was worth the hassles it may have caused. I know I had a few gape-mouthed smile moments when my players did crazy stuff, like mind-meld with a large drake and offer to teach it how to cast fire magic. This was in a primordial world game, so basically one PC was responsible for why dragons breathe fire.Or with Mythic Earth (which got way too overpowered at high level), when one PC learned to magically conjure technology. Nothing quite like summoning a rocket-propelled-grenade, or planeshifting an enemy helicopter to the fey realm where technology doesn't work.I'm working on a 4e-ish version of EoM, which I'm currently playtesting in my newest campaign. Last night was the first session, and I was actually kind of proud of myself. For once, the players complained that my magic system was too under-powered!</blockquote>

Verification