Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6066371" data-attributes="member: 42582">Covered.I think it's interesting that there seems to be a persistent gap between what the "4e crowd" (at least on these boards) says they like about the game (martial fiat, to use [MENTION=11821]Obryn[/MENTION]'s terminology), and what others posit as the attraction (tactical skirmish linked by freeform roleplay was the starkest description, from Justin Alexander). Mearls, in talking about D&Dnext "modules" to support 4e players, also seems to have taken tactical skirmish to be the attraction.Maybe the 4e crowd on these boards are a minority of 4e players, and the bulk really do play it for tactical skirmishing? Or is it another case of WotC's market research not telling them what is really going on?</blockquote>