Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Relique du Madde" data-source="post: 5119158" data-attributes="member: 42169">I had no ammo.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :("&nbsp; data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" />I pulled out the Urban Arcana and looked up the sizes of the example cities on the district generation table.&nbsp; Sadly, the city sizes make no sense.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D"&nbsp; data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Milwaukee (small).... 604k pop.&nbsp; 97 sq. milesBaltimore (Average)....636k pop. 92 sq. milesChicago (large)..... 2.8 mil pop.&nbsp; 234 sq. miles (not including the metro area)New York (collosal)...8.3 mill pop. 468 sq. miles (not including metro area)Acording to these numbers the only collosal cities in the US would be New York and Los Angeles (498 sq miles), though depending on where you put lower size limit for the Collosal cities, Chicago might be considered one.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Relique du Madde, post: 5119158, member: 42169"] I had no ammo. :( I pulled out the Urban Arcana and looked up the sizes of the example cities on the district generation table. Sadly, the city sizes make no sense. :D Milwaukee (small).... 604k pop. 97 sq. miles Baltimore (Average)....636k pop. 92 sq. miles Chicago (large)..... 2.8 mil pop. 234 sq. miles (not including the metro area) New York (collosal)...8.3 mill pop. 468 sq. miles (not including metro area) Acording to these numbers the only collosal cities in the US would be New York and Los Angeles (498 sq miles), though depending on where you put lower size limit for the Collosal cities, Chicago might be considered one. [/QUOTE]

Verification