Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
From the WotC Boards: Mearls on 'Aggro'
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ahglock" data-source="post: 3882061" data-attributes="member: 56725"><p>The theory isn't absurdly illogical. If Fighter A is super dangerous if ignored, you can't ignore the fighter. Its basic logical theory. The practice in MMOs though is illogical because they just add threat to fighter moves because they want him hit not because its somehow more threatening. Also in MMOs fighters can stay up the entire fight if he is exclusively being pounded on with healer support while a mage will drop in a round. The disparity in pen and paper games is usually not nearly as large. So while the mage is a softer target he isn't a paper target vs a main battle tank target. </p><p></p><p>What it looks like they did is create a agro mechanic that works on the human mind and not the AI. And yes it is basically a agro system. You are creating threat so the human DM makes the decision to hit the fighter instead of the mage. Just like in a mmorpg you create threat so the AI mind decides to attack the warrior instead of the mage. So instead of saying here is a debuff which we tack on an extra 500 threat with, they instead say if you pass by a fighter you get hit by this immediate action, and trust me you want to avoid that immediate action. Its best you deal with the fighter first. </p><p></p><p>The only real difference against a human DM instead of an AI you have to make the threat real and not an arbitrary 500 tacked on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ahglock, post: 3882061, member: 56725"] The theory isn't absurdly illogical. If Fighter A is super dangerous if ignored, you can't ignore the fighter. Its basic logical theory. The practice in MMOs though is illogical because they just add threat to fighter moves because they want him hit not because its somehow more threatening. Also in MMOs fighters can stay up the entire fight if he is exclusively being pounded on with healer support while a mage will drop in a round. The disparity in pen and paper games is usually not nearly as large. So while the mage is a softer target he isn't a paper target vs a main battle tank target. What it looks like they did is create a agro mechanic that works on the human mind and not the AI. And yes it is basically a agro system. You are creating threat so the human DM makes the decision to hit the fighter instead of the mage. Just like in a mmorpg you create threat so the AI mind decides to attack the warrior instead of the mage. So instead of saying here is a debuff which we tack on an extra 500 threat with, they instead say if you pass by a fighter you get hit by this immediate action, and trust me you want to avoid that immediate action. Its best you deal with the fighter first. The only real difference against a human DM instead of an AI you have to make the threat real and not an arbitrary 500 tacked on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
From the WotC Boards: Mearls on 'Aggro'
Top