Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
From the WotC Boards: Mearls on 'Aggro'
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TwinBahamut" data-source="post: 3882585" data-attributes="member: 32536"><p>Err... what? You should clarify that pretty quickly, or I am just going to take that as an crude insult. I am going to be fair and assume thst you are not just saying either that the games are all somehow ihernetly bad, and don't count, or that they are games for stupid people. The only other interpretation I can think of is that they are games with stupid AI (which may be true), but that kind of claim is irrelevant at this point.</p><p></p><p>You did not specify any <em>type</em> of RPG in your claim that every computer/console RPG has aggro mechanics. In other words, you are referring to the sum of all RPGs. That claim is false, and you can't just try to pull out of it by dismissing my point as applying only to "stupid-RPGs".</p><p></p><p>So what? I know this well enough, and it is totally beside my point.</p><p></p><p>No matter what draws the aggro, aggro rules are always based on a monster attacking whatever annoys it the most. They assume that tanks must annoy monsters more than other characters in order to protect the party, and that monsters can freely move around and attack what they want. Fundamantally, they are a product of MMORPGs which have never implemented a system of allowing formation tactics and physical blocking of enemy movement.</p><p></p><p>There are many other systems in which enemy targetting is not based on aggrevation or risk to the monster, but on the monster's ability to do damage (pretty much the rule in tactical RPGs), or on random chance (pretty much the rule in all traditional Japanese RPGs). I would say that these games probably outnumber MMORPGs that use the aggro system, and <em>certainly</em> count for enough to not be totally disregarded.</p><p></p><p>Of important note is that the videogames that most resemble D&D, Japanese tactical RPGs like Final Fantasy Tactics, Disgaea, Fire Emblem, and Super Robot Taisen, don't use aggro rules at all. Enemy AI primarily operates on opportunism and dealing damage as quickly as possible to whoever is within reach, and protecting weaker allies is built entirely on tactical movement (Fire Emblem's shoving and rescuing, moving to safe terrain, Disgaea's lift/throw, etc).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TwinBahamut, post: 3882585, member: 32536"] Err... what? You should clarify that pretty quickly, or I am just going to take that as an crude insult. I am going to be fair and assume thst you are not just saying either that the games are all somehow ihernetly bad, and don't count, or that they are games for stupid people. The only other interpretation I can think of is that they are games with stupid AI (which may be true), but that kind of claim is irrelevant at this point. You did not specify any [i]type[/i] of RPG in your claim that every computer/console RPG has aggro mechanics. In other words, you are referring to the sum of all RPGs. That claim is false, and you can't just try to pull out of it by dismissing my point as applying only to "stupid-RPGs". So what? I know this well enough, and it is totally beside my point. No matter what draws the aggro, aggro rules are always based on a monster attacking whatever annoys it the most. They assume that tanks must annoy monsters more than other characters in order to protect the party, and that monsters can freely move around and attack what they want. Fundamantally, they are a product of MMORPGs which have never implemented a system of allowing formation tactics and physical blocking of enemy movement. There are many other systems in which enemy targetting is not based on aggrevation or risk to the monster, but on the monster's ability to do damage (pretty much the rule in tactical RPGs), or on random chance (pretty much the rule in all traditional Japanese RPGs). I would say that these games probably outnumber MMORPGs that use the aggro system, and [i]certainly[/i] count for enough to not be totally disregarded. Of important note is that the videogames that most resemble D&D, Japanese tactical RPGs like Final Fantasy Tactics, Disgaea, Fire Emblem, and Super Robot Taisen, don't use aggro rules at all. Enemy AI primarily operates on opportunism and dealing damage as quickly as possible to whoever is within reach, and protecting weaker allies is built entirely on tactical movement (Fire Emblem's shoving and rescuing, moving to safe terrain, Disgaea's lift/throw, etc). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
From the WotC Boards: Mearls on 'Aggro'
Top