Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 1768963" data-attributes="member: 8158">Come on now. I'm having trouble buying the arguement that repeating content within the same book is beneficial because it's like having two books in one That's kind of specious reasoning. Heck, it's downright infomercial material <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> See, nothing you mentioned there is really all that innovative or definitive in the way it's presented IMO. For instance, what does a gamer really know about handling iicebergs after reading FB that he didn't know before? What do I get from FB's snow goblins that I couldn't have made up on my own? Just perusing this post and others, I sense a lot of people giving kudos to FB just for being 244 pages. I was impressed by the size too initially. But it's the same big-bun tactic that fast food companies use.</blockquote>