Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Frustrating Gamers- slight rant
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dreaded_beast" data-source="post: 825874" data-attributes="member: 11185"><p>apologies, rant on:</p><p></p><p>a pet peeve of mine is when DMs act as if their interpretation for their campaign is the "correct" way the rules should be interpreted in general. in my opinion, if a DM interprets a rule a certain that somewhat differs from what is presented in the books or makes a ruling on an "ambiguous" rule, then it is "house ruled". i find it annoying when DMs create "house rules" (base on my definition), but act as if their "house rules" are actually how the designers intended the rules to be interpreted. they act as if their interpretation is correct and any other way to interpret is wrong, or at least less correct than their own interpretation, but it all boils down to the DM acting as if their interpretation is the only valid one.</p><p></p><p>*of course, DM decisions for THEIR campaign are inherently correct since it is their campaign after all, regardless of how "wrong" or "correct" these decisions actually are. it's just irritating when these DM act as if their decisions for THEIR campaign are "correct" ones that can be and should be applied to other campaigns as well. especially when they make remarks like, "this is how the creators of the game meant the rule to be handled...". how the heck do they know what the creators of the game meant? they can only interpret based on their own experiences that this is what they could possibly mean. by making statements like that, it's as if the DM is saying that their interpretations are not "house rules" but something akin to "official rulings" (which is only "official" to THEIR campaign). of course, this wouldn't be such a big deal if said DMs were not so hesistant to think that they could be wrong in their interpretations.</p><p></p><p>i believe that this is a form of snobbery seen at the gametable, where DMs being DMs, feel as if they know the rules better than the players, and any interpretation done by the players is not at the same level as the DMs.</p><p></p><p>apologies, rant off</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dreaded_beast, post: 825874, member: 11185"] apologies, rant on: a pet peeve of mine is when DMs act as if their interpretation for their campaign is the "correct" way the rules should be interpreted in general. in my opinion, if a DM interprets a rule a certain that somewhat differs from what is presented in the books or makes a ruling on an "ambiguous" rule, then it is "house ruled". i find it annoying when DMs create "house rules" (base on my definition), but act as if their "house rules" are actually how the designers intended the rules to be interpreted. they act as if their interpretation is correct and any other way to interpret is wrong, or at least less correct than their own interpretation, but it all boils down to the DM acting as if their interpretation is the only valid one. *of course, DM decisions for THEIR campaign are inherently correct since it is their campaign after all, regardless of how "wrong" or "correct" these decisions actually are. it's just irritating when these DM act as if their decisions for THEIR campaign are "correct" ones that can be and should be applied to other campaigns as well. especially when they make remarks like, "this is how the creators of the game meant the rule to be handled...". how the heck do they know what the creators of the game meant? they can only interpret based on their own experiences that this is what they could possibly mean. by making statements like that, it's as if the DM is saying that their interpretations are not "house rules" but something akin to "official rulings" (which is only "official" to THEIR campaign). of course, this wouldn't be such a big deal if said DMs were not so hesistant to think that they could be wrong in their interpretations. i believe that this is a form of snobbery seen at the gametable, where DMs being DMs, feel as if they know the rules better than the players, and any interpretation done by the players is not at the same level as the DMs. apologies, rant off [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Frustrating Gamers- slight rant
Top