Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fudging: DM vs player preferences
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Noctem" data-source="post: 6804331" data-attributes="member: 6801315"><p>The party succeeding at exploration and social interaction is in the best interest of the plot, story and essentially the DM. There's no need to fudge in those cases and fudging itself is way more limited. The DM could change the DC's on a whim, but what's the point? Success usually means information is shared or the plot/storyline advances right? </p><p></p><p>On the other hand in combat, there's way more situations to fudge for the DM. So odds are, most of the fudging at a table would happen during combat. Next question is what is being fudged? Attack rolls, save vs effects, skills are the biggest names I would think. So let me ask you this: When you fudge, since you openly stated that you do, how do you do it? Do you ask for the consent of the other participants at the table? That could be 4+ people. Do you ask for their input on what would be in their best interest / to their benefit? Do you do it openly, stating that you're going to change the result of the roll to a number you choose?</p><p></p><p>Or do you do it in secret, without input from the other participants, based on what you and only you believe is in the best interest of everyone else or the game? And if this is the case, why not do it in the open? Why hide it? I think we both know the answer to that question if it applies...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Noctem, post: 6804331, member: 6801315"] The party succeeding at exploration and social interaction is in the best interest of the plot, story and essentially the DM. There's no need to fudge in those cases and fudging itself is way more limited. The DM could change the DC's on a whim, but what's the point? Success usually means information is shared or the plot/storyline advances right? On the other hand in combat, there's way more situations to fudge for the DM. So odds are, most of the fudging at a table would happen during combat. Next question is what is being fudged? Attack rolls, save vs effects, skills are the biggest names I would think. So let me ask you this: When you fudge, since you openly stated that you do, how do you do it? Do you ask for the consent of the other participants at the table? That could be 4+ people. Do you ask for their input on what would be in their best interest / to their benefit? Do you do it openly, stating that you're going to change the result of the roll to a number you choose? Or do you do it in secret, without input from the other participants, based on what you and only you believe is in the best interest of everyone else or the game? And if this is the case, why not do it in the open? Why hide it? I think we both know the answer to that question if it applies... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fudging: DM vs player preferences
Top