Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tenkar" data-source="post: 3863495" data-attributes="member: 15047">Much of what I'm going to say has probably already been said by others but I feel a need to throw my hat into the ring:1 - Most first level characters have abilities far beyond that of mortal men.  Spell casters (both divine and arcane), paladins, barbarians, rogues, bards... basically all classes but a pure fighter does something that "normals" just can't do.  It has been this way since OD&D.  I fail to see how this is significantly different in 4e.  If 0-level peasants start turning undead, radiating protection from evil from their person, or start casting magic missiles then the game has changed significantly. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />2 - All reports on 4e show the bling level being turned down... I will assume that you are misinformed on this.3 - DnD becoming more computer adaptable is GREAT!  Now if I want to get my core group of friends together to game I don't need to wait for folks to fly from Dallas to NYC for some gaming.  If WoTC ups the VTT to a new level I'll be a very happy camper.4 - I foresee more mook fights in 4e then in 3.5... of course we won't know for sure before the masses get their hands on it.5 - I don't care if DnD influences video game design.  Why should I care?  How does that effect my gaming (both RPG and video gaming)?</blockquote>

Verification