Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
[FULL] OOC: Dichotomy's Age of Worms Redux [FULL]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="worthley" data-source="post: 3764827" data-attributes="member: 45462"><p>This may seem counterproductive, but I suggest that all rules should stay as they are. I am in no way saying that the rules perfect the way they are. I am just saying, whenever it comes down someone not agreeing with the way a rule works, it makes the game come to a complete halt for two weeks. Recently I've notices that this has made me disinterested in the game, as I couldn't give a poo (edited: South Park style) about player A wanting only players with the use rope skill to be able to wear boots with laces. I care infinately about the story and game flow than I do about how rules work. I know I caused some of this with trying to understand how wizards get new spells.</p><p></p><p>I am unsure if this is a problem for anyone else. It has made the game hard for me to get excited about. I don't think that it would have been a problem if we kept the story going, but I think there is somthing retarded with us that makes it where we can't do more than one thing at a time. I am going to try to get excited about the game again, but from now on, I am going to ignore any arguments about possible rule changes. Also, instead of arguing for a week and a half of "where are we" I'm going to accept Di's statement of where we are in this game and accept it, instead of trying to figure out if it's a reasonable time to abuse the rule I just changed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="worthley, post: 3764827, member: 45462"] This may seem counterproductive, but I suggest that all rules should stay as they are. I am in no way saying that the rules perfect the way they are. I am just saying, whenever it comes down someone not agreeing with the way a rule works, it makes the game come to a complete halt for two weeks. Recently I've notices that this has made me disinterested in the game, as I couldn't give a poo (edited: South Park style) about player A wanting only players with the use rope skill to be able to wear boots with laces. I care infinately about the story and game flow than I do about how rules work. I know I caused some of this with trying to understand how wizards get new spells. I am unsure if this is a problem for anyone else. It has made the game hard for me to get excited about. I don't think that it would have been a problem if we kept the story going, but I think there is somthing retarded with us that makes it where we can't do more than one thing at a time. I am going to try to get excited about the game again, but from now on, I am going to ignore any arguments about possible rule changes. Also, instead of arguing for a week and a half of "where are we" I'm going to accept Di's statement of where we are in this game and accept it, instead of trying to figure out if it's a reasonable time to abuse the rule I just changed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
[FULL] OOC: Dichotomy's Age of Worms Redux [FULL]
Top