Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
[FULL] OOC: Dichotomy's Age of Worms Redux [FULL]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dichotomy" data-source="post: 4124286" data-attributes="member: 12941"><p>This is probably more for my benefit than anyone else's. However, that statement should not be construed so as to absolve you of the need to read the post.</p><p></p><p>1. Regarding boots of striding (& springing). I think we discussed this. I also think that o3's argument that they should cost less (for economic reasons) is, in this instance, undermined by o3's concluding statement (which reads like a concession on the point). Is there anything else to be said about this issue? If not, I think we should make them cost the same, but allow a person without the ranks in jump have the ability to craft them w/o jump bonus.</p><p></p><p>2. Character wealth issues of wands and spellbooks.</p><p>2a. Spellbooks: I discussed this at least with Ti and worthley (and I think Ti discussed it with o3). Here is my conclusion: spells which are added to Bazrim's spellbook solely because he automatically learned then upon gaining a level, should NOT count toward the "value" of his spellbook. Spells added via other means (e.g. purchased, recovered from captured spellbooks, etc.) DO count toward the "value" of his spellbook. As a sidenote, once Bazrim had copied spells from captured spellbooks into his own spellbook, the captured spellbook should be able to be sold.</p><p>2b. Wands: Again, discussed over the weekend. Here's the bottom line: if Bazrim gets to continually invest his share of treasure in wands, use those wands, and then have that not count against Bazrim's later share of the treasure, Bazrim would get a huge windfall. This isn't terribly equitable. I think we all agreed that wands should count toward the total value of the owner's possessions (and not be reduced because they are used). Essentially, the notion is that value should be tracked by what a party member has ACQUIRED, whether it still exists or not. Now, this brings up the question of whether that means we all need to rigorously keep track of potions, acid flasks, etc. that we've long since used and the like. THAT could be cumbersome. Thoughts?</p><p></p><p>What else do we need to finish up?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dichotomy, post: 4124286, member: 12941"] This is probably more for my benefit than anyone else's. However, that statement should not be construed so as to absolve you of the need to read the post. 1. Regarding boots of striding (& springing). I think we discussed this. I also think that o3's argument that they should cost less (for economic reasons) is, in this instance, undermined by o3's concluding statement (which reads like a concession on the point). Is there anything else to be said about this issue? If not, I think we should make them cost the same, but allow a person without the ranks in jump have the ability to craft them w/o jump bonus. 2. Character wealth issues of wands and spellbooks. 2a. Spellbooks: I discussed this at least with Ti and worthley (and I think Ti discussed it with o3). Here is my conclusion: spells which are added to Bazrim's spellbook solely because he automatically learned then upon gaining a level, should NOT count toward the "value" of his spellbook. Spells added via other means (e.g. purchased, recovered from captured spellbooks, etc.) DO count toward the "value" of his spellbook. As a sidenote, once Bazrim had copied spells from captured spellbooks into his own spellbook, the captured spellbook should be able to be sold. 2b. Wands: Again, discussed over the weekend. Here's the bottom line: if Bazrim gets to continually invest his share of treasure in wands, use those wands, and then have that not count against Bazrim's later share of the treasure, Bazrim would get a huge windfall. This isn't terribly equitable. I think we all agreed that wands should count toward the total value of the owner's possessions (and not be reduced because they are used). Essentially, the notion is that value should be tracked by what a party member has ACQUIRED, whether it still exists or not. Now, this brings up the question of whether that means we all need to rigorously keep track of potions, acid flasks, etc. that we've long since used and the like. THAT could be cumbersome. Thoughts? What else do we need to finish up? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
[FULL] OOC: Dichotomy's Age of Worms Redux [FULL]
Top