Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TiCaudata" data-source="post: 4124831" data-attributes="member: 40077">Alright, since Worthley hasn't gone and posted any addendum to what he wants I'm going to assume that his earlier post of is accurate.This leaves us with a grand total of 11,974 for scrolls and wands.  That's a good haul.  If we go with one of every scroll on our 'wish list' we would have 4,249 left for wands.  I don't know if I believe that to be a good idea or not though, since multiple wands might have more value to us than "just in case" scrolls.Moving on, I'm ok with only the added spells counting for Worthley.  I haven't received a final answer on whether we ever sold the spellbooks that Bazrim copied from or not though.  Assuming we haven't, that's a bit of wealth that will balance out for Bazrim.  Looking at Bazrim's spellbook, I see that he has marked 1,400 worth of spells as being 'purchased'.  I don't believe that this includes any of the spells that were copied over from the captured spellbooks though, since 'shield' isn't on that list, but was commented as being copied over on the first or second page of our current IC thread.  Shield raises the worth of Bazrim's current spellbook to 1500, anything else raises it more.I do think we need to come up with some way of keeping track of ephemeral wealth such as wands and scrolls.  Since this is our first division of wealth it would be easy in theory to start right now by making a 'wand and scroll' sheet and keeping track of how much wealth and charges each wand has.  The unfortunate part of such a spreadsheet is that I believe I would be stuck with keeping track of everyone's wands since I tend to be more diligent (read:  less patient) about keeping those neat.  That admission shouldn't be read as "Oh goody!  Ti will just keep track of them!" because that'll make me cranky and prone to adding penalty charges or something else vague but threatening.That's all I got for now I think.</blockquote>

Verification