Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Full strength bonus on both weapons in two weapon fighting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brother MacLaren" data-source="post: 2213122" data-attributes="member: 15999"><p>OF COURSE NOT. I never said it was balanced. Go re-read my post again - I specifically noted that the THF does better against a higher AC, and you bring up that as a point to rebut my post?</p><p></p><p>Where, exactly, did I say TWF was "equitable" or "balanced"? I spelled out <em>certain circumstances </em> in which the TWF does well (and, yes, I forgot the off-hand Str penalty, my mistake; on the other hand, I did use 2 short swords rather than long-short or 2-bladed sword). And I specifically acknowledged that THF is more powerful due to the times when you only get one attack - AOOs or when moving. </p><p></p><p><em>Of course</em> if you don't have a bard or cleric you don't get the benefit of their abilities. That's irrelevant to my point, which was that TWF tends to benefit more than other styles from abilities that apply a bonus to damage (I see that you caught this point in your first reply). Because it starts out so far behind, as you noted, this isn't a game-breaker - but it was a simple statistical observation, not an assessment of the overall power of the two styles. I came up with a situation using variables from the 9th-level game in which I play (bard with boosted Inspire Courage, Str 16 fighter-type, AC +/-20 foes). Looking at the MM, most CR 6 monsters do have AC of 20 or less (even dragons and outsiders).</p><p></p><p>Now, you mention that only Fighters get specialization. True, but other classes have their own bonuses that give more of an advantage to TWF than to THF:</p><p>Ranger doesn't get Specialization, but Favored Enemy bonus can be as high as +13. A Ranger with the two-weapon combat style gets several feats for free without needing the 19 Dex, so the TWF style works well for the Ranger.</p><p>Swashbuckler doesn't get Specialization, but can use Int bonus.</p><p>Paladin doesn't get Specialization, but can use Smite and Divine Might.</p><p>Dervish Dance gives up to +5, which stacks with Specialization.</p><p>The TWF build is great for rogues, of course.</p><p>Barbarian, true, is always best with THF, as are other Str-based builds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brother MacLaren, post: 2213122, member: 15999"] OF COURSE NOT. I never said it was balanced. Go re-read my post again - I specifically noted that the THF does better against a higher AC, and you bring up that as a point to rebut my post? Where, exactly, did I say TWF was "equitable" or "balanced"? I spelled out [I]certain circumstances [/I] in which the TWF does well (and, yes, I forgot the off-hand Str penalty, my mistake; on the other hand, I did use 2 short swords rather than long-short or 2-bladed sword). And I specifically acknowledged that THF is more powerful due to the times when you only get one attack - AOOs or when moving. [I]Of course[/I] if you don't have a bard or cleric you don't get the benefit of their abilities. That's irrelevant to my point, which was that TWF tends to benefit more than other styles from abilities that apply a bonus to damage (I see that you caught this point in your first reply). Because it starts out so far behind, as you noted, this isn't a game-breaker - but it was a simple statistical observation, not an assessment of the overall power of the two styles. I came up with a situation using variables from the 9th-level game in which I play (bard with boosted Inspire Courage, Str 16 fighter-type, AC +/-20 foes). Looking at the MM, most CR 6 monsters do have AC of 20 or less (even dragons and outsiders). Now, you mention that only Fighters get specialization. True, but other classes have their own bonuses that give more of an advantage to TWF than to THF: Ranger doesn't get Specialization, but Favored Enemy bonus can be as high as +13. A Ranger with the two-weapon combat style gets several feats for free without needing the 19 Dex, so the TWF style works well for the Ranger. Swashbuckler doesn't get Specialization, but can use Int bonus. Paladin doesn't get Specialization, but can use Smite and Divine Might. Dervish Dance gives up to +5, which stacks with Specialization. The TWF build is great for rogues, of course. Barbarian, true, is always best with THF, as are other Str-based builds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Full strength bonus on both weapons in two weapon fighting
Top