Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RangerWickett" data-source="post: 5088301" data-attributes="member: 63">[sblock]1.&nbsp; B2.&nbsp; 233.&nbsp; Chicken4.&nbsp; 81. Pattern is divide by 3, multiply by 9, divide by 3, multiply by 9. . . .5.&nbsp; Cow6.&nbsp; 121112. The pattern is just do &quot;odd number, even number, odd number&quot; and squish them together. Then do the next set of &quot;even, odd, even.&quot; Then go back to &quot;odd, even, odd.&quot;7. Helga. The pattern is alphabetical, switching between genders.8.&nbsp; 400, or possibly 361. The pattern I saw was:(100 25 1 400 225 100 900 625)10 squared, 5 squared, 1 squared. 20 squared, 15 squared, 10 squared. 30 squared, 25 squared . . .Now, either the pattern is &quot;find the square of a number, then that number minus 5, then that number minus 10, then start over by adding 10 to the initial number&quot; and the first set should have had 0 instead of 1; or it's something more complicated like &quot;Each set goes x, x-5, x-8-y where y is the number of this set. Then you start the next set and increase x by 10.&quot;In the former the final number would be 400 (20 squared). In the latter it would be 361 (19 squared). Maybe I missed a more obvious pattern.9.&nbsp; bark10.&nbsp; 189 is guess one.1 9 7 3 20 180 178 172.It looks like 'multiply by 9, minus 2, minus 4, plus 17; multiply by 9, minus 2, minus 6' . . . so do we go plus 17?Or it could be . . . well, 1+9+7+3 = 20, but that doesn't pan out in any other way. I dunno. I'm not seeing anything.[/sblock]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RangerWickett, post: 5088301, member: 63"] [sblock] 1. B 2. 23 3. Chicken 4. 81. Pattern is divide by 3, multiply by 9, divide by 3, multiply by 9. . . . 5. Cow 6. 121112. The pattern is just do "odd number, even number, odd number" and squish them together. Then do the next set of "even, odd, even." Then go back to "odd, even, odd." 7. Helga. The pattern is alphabetical, switching between genders. 8. 400, or possibly 361. The pattern I saw was: (100 25 1 400 225 100 900 625) 10 squared, 5 squared, 1 squared. 20 squared, 15 squared, 10 squared. 30 squared, 25 squared . . . Now, either the pattern is "find the square of a number, then that number minus 5, then that number minus 10, then start over by adding 10 to the initial number" and the first set should have had 0 instead of 1; or it's something more complicated like "Each set goes x, x-5, x-8-y where y is the number of this set. Then you start the next set and increase x by 10." In the former the final number would be 400 (20 squared). In the latter it would be 361 (19 squared). Maybe I missed a more obvious pattern. 9. bark 10. 189 is guess one. 1 9 7 3 20 180 178 172. It looks like 'multiply by 9, minus 2, minus 4, plus 17; multiply by 9, minus 2, minus 6' . . . so do we go plus 17? Or it could be . . . well, 1+9+7+3 = 20, but that doesn't pan out in any other way. I dunno. I'm not seeing anything. [/sblock] [/QUOTE]

Verification