Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Fun vs. Reality: a false dichotomy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Glade Riven" data-source="post: 5473313" data-attributes="member: 86468"><p>I have never seen a real RPG. Realism is physics, and since I hate advanced mathematics, screw that.</p><p> </p><p>It is not about being real. It is about <em>feeling</em> real, which is probably what people are talking about, but "realism" is a loaded term, so I prefer to clarify. My favorite term comes from the animation industry and other creative arts: <strong>Suspension of Disbelief</strong>.</p><p> </p><p>Suspension of Disbelief simiply means "does this thing have some basic internal logic on why things work the way they do?" There are several different approaches to this: Narratively and Mechanically. Campaign Settings, suppliments, and a whole lot of DM work goes into narrative sense. Mechanically, that is what the rule systems are for. Table top RPGs need both.</p><p> </p><p>Where Suspension of Disbelief is weaked is on certain rules that exist to make gameplay work, but don't necessarally make sense to a person. These hangups are usually minor, but minor things can grate the most. For some people, Vancian magic weakens Suspension of Disbelief. Usually, this is because literary magic doesn't work that way (magic in literary works are plot devices, although they may be dressed up with a general idea of a system). For others, it is the inability to rectify wounds with HP. It varies, and is one reason why different systems appeal to different people.</p><p> </p><p>Fortunatly, with a bit of creativity the weaknesses in the mechanics (which are unavoidable and happen with any system) can be glossed over Narratively. 3.5 core books suggested personalising how a spell is cast instead of just saying "I cast Magic Missile." Something like "Mumbing foul words in an ancient tounge, I raise my left hand. Sparks of pure light flicker and squirm through the air from my fingertips, culminating with these magic missiles coalescing on the brutish orc" is more like it.</p><p> </p><p>And yes, sometimes a DM has to cheat. But it's like being a magician or performing sleight of hand - if you do your job right, nobody will know the difference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Glade Riven, post: 5473313, member: 86468"] I have never seen a real RPG. Realism is physics, and since I hate advanced mathematics, screw that. It is not about being real. It is about [I]feeling[/I] real, which is probably what people are talking about, but "realism" is a loaded term, so I prefer to clarify. My favorite term comes from the animation industry and other creative arts: [B]Suspension of Disbelief[/B]. Suspension of Disbelief simiply means "does this thing have some basic internal logic on why things work the way they do?" There are several different approaches to this: Narratively and Mechanically. Campaign Settings, suppliments, and a whole lot of DM work goes into narrative sense. Mechanically, that is what the rule systems are for. Table top RPGs need both. Where Suspension of Disbelief is weaked is on certain rules that exist to make gameplay work, but don't necessarally make sense to a person. These hangups are usually minor, but minor things can grate the most. For some people, Vancian magic weakens Suspension of Disbelief. Usually, this is because literary magic doesn't work that way (magic in literary works are plot devices, although they may be dressed up with a general idea of a system). For others, it is the inability to rectify wounds with HP. It varies, and is one reason why different systems appeal to different people. Fortunatly, with a bit of creativity the weaknesses in the mechanics (which are unavoidable and happen with any system) can be glossed over Narratively. 3.5 core books suggested personalising how a spell is cast instead of just saying "I cast Magic Missile." Something like "Mumbing foul words in an ancient tounge, I raise my left hand. Sparks of pure light flicker and squirm through the air from my fingertips, culminating with these magic missiles coalescing on the brutish orc" is more like it. And yes, sometimes a DM has to cheat. But it's like being a magician or performing sleight of hand - if you do your job right, nobody will know the difference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Fun vs. Reality: a false dichotomy?
Top