Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Funny Email From a Publisher re. Reviews
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Toscadero" data-source="post: 421739" data-attributes="member: 2297"><p>Avanlanche stated in their e-mail, "A customer who has paid for the product has every right to complain as much as they want about the product, and its value. Someone who got it for free does not reserve such judgement."</p><p></p><p>I always thought that it was a reviewer's job to give an honest opinion of the item being reviewed. Talking about the product's value for your dollar is part of the review. It should be reviewed in such a way to be informative to the reader. I'm not getting the product for free so I want to know if I'm getting bang for my buck. Whether the reviewer got the product for free or paid his own hard cash for it should not be a consideration when he is rating it for the consumer. </p><p></p><p>When Avalanche says that they will continue to provide free copies to other sites (which I also read), they imply that that is only as long as they are happy with the reviews. I had been considering some of their product after reading reviews both from this site and others. If Avalanche wants to play favorites with reviewers that is their decision. Not buying their products is my decision.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Toscadero, post: 421739, member: 2297"] Avanlanche stated in their e-mail, "A customer who has paid for the product has every right to complain as much as they want about the product, and its value. Someone who got it for free does not reserve such judgement." I always thought that it was a reviewer's job to give an honest opinion of the item being reviewed. Talking about the product's value for your dollar is part of the review. It should be reviewed in such a way to be informative to the reader. I'm not getting the product for free so I want to know if I'm getting bang for my buck. Whether the reviewer got the product for free or paid his own hard cash for it should not be a consideration when he is rating it for the consumer. When Avalanche says that they will continue to provide free copies to other sites (which I also read), they imply that that is only as long as they are happy with the reviews. I had been considering some of their product after reading reviews both from this site and others. If Avalanche wants to play favorites with reviewers that is their decision. Not buying their products is my decision. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Funny Email From a Publisher re. Reviews
Top