Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Gale Force 9 Sues WotC [Updated]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 8133022" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>If a company breaches and you give notice of breach, that's "WOTC ending the contract early". If the other company doesn't want that to happen and wants to try and cure the breach, that's "GF9 didn't agree to that." If WOTC says "no further products" that's using the breach clause which typically says fulfill on what's already been produced by cease all further products beyond existing inventory.</p><p></p><p>This is what a breach of contract typically looks like, though sometimes it instead looks like handing over existing inventory. This IS ending the contract early, often. Typical contracts breach clauses allow for finishing out existing inventory. This is often what a "valid strong enough case to end the contract early" could reasonably look like. Otherwise a company could breach and then also just run away with the produced inventory. </p><p></p><p>I again think people are trying to spin this as being the Dragonlance round hole and trying to shove this square peg into that hole and say they are the same thing. I have serious doubts that's what is happening here. The allegation that GF9 screwed up translations in an offensive way is a serious one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 8133022, member: 2525"] If a company breaches and you give notice of breach, that's "WOTC ending the contract early". If the other company doesn't want that to happen and wants to try and cure the breach, that's "GF9 didn't agree to that." If WOTC says "no further products" that's using the breach clause which typically says fulfill on what's already been produced by cease all further products beyond existing inventory. This is what a breach of contract typically looks like, though sometimes it instead looks like handing over existing inventory. This IS ending the contract early, often. Typical contracts breach clauses allow for finishing out existing inventory. This is often what a "valid strong enough case to end the contract early" could reasonably look like. Otherwise a company could breach and then also just run away with the produced inventory. I again think people are trying to spin this as being the Dragonlance round hole and trying to shove this square peg into that hole and say they are the same thing. I have serious doubts that's what is happening here. The allegation that GF9 screwed up translations in an offensive way is a serious one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Gale Force 9 Sues WotC [Updated]
Top