Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Game Balance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nathal" data-source="post: 486022" data-attributes="member: 1809"><p>I was thinking about "game balance". I believe game balance refers to equal power among characters within the context of combat and has little meaning outside of that. Obviously it is most important for games whose GMs have a heavy combat orientation, and D&D is a good example of a high level of attention going into "balanced" encounters and whatnot.</p><p></p><p>But in LA, GURPS, or any other totally open ended game, a player has the option of creating a non combat-oriented character. A newbie GM may be at a loss to create good encounters for characters in such a system. This may be obvious but I think it has significant impact of the whole concept of game balance... </p><p></p><p>In games like D&D it is expected that no one class is more powerful than any other, and that is generally true (although the source of endless debate on particulars). So, it seems to me, it is just about expected that combat be the focus of such games.</p><p> </p><p>On the other hand, games like Lejendary Adventure, GURPs or even RIFTS allow the player to create a character that is basically weak. OR one can create a near juggernaut. It depends on the choices made. It is easy to see that D&D does not allow this sort of self-imposed weakness, with the basic classes designed as they are (characters get more powerful whether they like it or not). Why would a player do this to himself? Quick answer: given the chance, many players will create non combat type characters, especially female players. </p><p></p><p>This creates a whole new challenge to the GM, and one which I have not seen written about in any great length.</p><p></p><p>Game Masters probably get most of their experience balancing encounters against the average party level in D&D, and so may wonder how to create a good challenge for their players in games that don't have such "game balance" built in by force of design...</p><p></p><p></p><p>To repeat: Game balance usually refers to combat because outside of that aspect it means little. In point-based games the player can make his character more useful by simply playing out his abilities well. That goes for GURPS, LA, etc. It is up to the player to make his character valuable if "but-kicker" is not built right in and requiring no effort.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nathal, post: 486022, member: 1809"] I was thinking about "game balance". I believe game balance refers to equal power among characters within the context of combat and has little meaning outside of that. Obviously it is most important for games whose GMs have a heavy combat orientation, and D&D is a good example of a high level of attention going into "balanced" encounters and whatnot. But in LA, GURPS, or any other totally open ended game, a player has the option of creating a non combat-oriented character. A newbie GM may be at a loss to create good encounters for characters in such a system. This may be obvious but I think it has significant impact of the whole concept of game balance... In games like D&D it is expected that no one class is more powerful than any other, and that is generally true (although the source of endless debate on particulars). So, it seems to me, it is just about expected that combat be the focus of such games. On the other hand, games like Lejendary Adventure, GURPs or even RIFTS allow the player to create a character that is basically weak. OR one can create a near juggernaut. It depends on the choices made. It is easy to see that D&D does not allow this sort of self-imposed weakness, with the basic classes designed as they are (characters get more powerful whether they like it or not). Why would a player do this to himself? Quick answer: given the chance, many players will create non combat type characters, especially female players. This creates a whole new challenge to the GM, and one which I have not seen written about in any great length. Game Masters probably get most of their experience balancing encounters against the average party level in D&D, and so may wonder how to create a good challenge for their players in games that don't have such "game balance" built in by force of design... To repeat: Game balance usually refers to combat because outside of that aspect it means little. In point-based games the player can make his character more useful by simply playing out his abilities well. That goes for GURPS, LA, etc. It is up to the player to make his character valuable if "but-kicker" is not built right in and requiring no effort. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Game Balance
Top