Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 5163324" data-attributes="member: 22779">Well, I know that I always WANTED to play those high level things, but, it just never happened.&nbsp; I'll agree that I probably didn't feel cheated, but, when it was pointed out to me that I probably only used about 2/3 of the rule set, it did kinda &quot;click&quot; with me when 3e was released.3e made it pretty explicit that the entire rule set was meant to be used.Steel Wind - your assumption that the player base has aged considerably isn't really supportable.&nbsp; For one, the readership of Dragon, for example, remained about 20ish for more than a few reader polls, including two done by Paizo.&nbsp; The average age of a gamer isn't likely all that much different than it was twenty years ago.Although, you'd think, if hte player base was much older than before, that more open ended campaigns would be the norm since isn't it generally thought that younger people lack the stability and attention span?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 5163324, member: 22779"] Well, I know that I always WANTED to play those high level things, but, it just never happened. I'll agree that I probably didn't feel cheated, but, when it was pointed out to me that I probably only used about 2/3 of the rule set, it did kinda "click" with me when 3e was released. 3e made it pretty explicit that the entire rule set was meant to be used. Steel Wind - your assumption that the player base has aged considerably isn't really supportable. For one, the readership of Dragon, for example, remained about 20ish for more than a few reader polls, including two done by Paizo. The average age of a gamer isn't likely all that much different than it was twenty years ago. Although, you'd think, if hte player base was much older than before, that more open ended campaigns would be the norm since isn't it generally thought that younger people lack the stability and attention span? [/QUOTE]

Verification