Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7743382" data-attributes="member: 996">I can't imagine an ambush being sprung /with/ warning ("Excuse me, but this in an ambush, if you don't want to be ambushed, you should go back and take the other fork" "Oh, thank you, no, I'd rather not be ambushed - guys, we're heading back and taking the left fork"  "Whew, so glad we're not being railroaded..."  "Well, that's another batch gone  ...I still say we'd make more money as bandits if we didn't do it this way."), it'd just not be an ambush anymore.  But OK, that's at least consistent:  if you walk into an ambush, you risk getting killed, if you sit down at the negotiating table, you risk making a bad deal. Another thing that makes it a bad example, I guess.  I see the issue more as are we modeling characters or not.  Though, on the closely-related topic of illusionism... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>